On Tuesday last week, the Legislative Yuan passed the third reading of amendments aimed at updating Article 141 of the Criminal Code.
The revised bill — forced through by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — stipulates that public servants who make false statements during hearings or questioning about important matters of which they have knowledge can face up to one year in prison and fines as high as NT$200,000.
Based on Constitutional Court rulings, the amended article is unconstitutional.
According to Constitutional Court Judgement No. 113 Hsien-Pan-5 regarding the offense of insulting public servants or their official duties, actions that constitute contempt of the legislature fall under the scope of speech that criticizes the actions taken by officials in the course of carrying out their duties rather than the officials themselves.
The judgement is similar to Article 140 of the Criminal Code regulating insults to public servants, whereby a “person who insults a public official during the discharge of his legal duties or publicly make[s] insults about his discharge of such legal duties shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year, short-term imprisonment, or a fine of not more than one hundred thousand New Taiwan Dollars.”
Constitutional Court Judgement No. 113 Hsien-Pan-5 further states that a provision conflicting with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech must undergo “strict scrutiny” — a judicial review method used by courts to determine the constitutionality of laws. To pass the scrutiny test and be classified as constitutional, a law must be indispensable and use the least restrictive means possible, and the legislative intent must be in pursuit of compelling public interest.
The “contempt of the legislature” bill should be modeled after the US legal system, in which its “contempt of Congress” is based upon “contempt of court” regulations.
Taiwan has its own equivalent law on the principle of contempt of court. Article 95 of Taiwan’s Court Organization Act (法院組織法) states that anyone “who violates orders, issued by the presiding judge, commissioned judge, or assigned judge, to maintain courtroom order, which lead to obstructing courtroom proceedings, and refuses to comply after being warned, shall receive a maximum penalty of 3 months’ imprisonment, detention or a maximum fine of NT$30,000.”
Under constitutional review standards, for someone to be prosecuted for contempt of court, they must have contravened an order, caused an obstruction to courtroom proceedings and refused to comply after being cautioned.
By contrast, the revised bill proposed by the KMT and TPP defines contempt of the legislature with a single criterion: providing a false statement during hearings or questioning in the Legislative Yuan. The overly broad scope for punishment raises concerns about the constitutionality of the amendments.
The Legislative Yuan has the duty to proactively carry out investigations.
It is thus unlikely that the amendments regarding contempt of the legislature would pass the scrutiny test, as imposing a criminal penalty does not seem to be “indispensable” or the “least restrictive” means possible to achieve a compelling state interest.
Furthermore, contempt of court is an outdated concept rooted in monarchical-era legal thought. Outdated and unconstitutional, the relevance of the offense of contempt should be reconsidered in Taiwan.
Hu Tien-tzu is a senior enforcement officer at the Changhua branch of the Ministry of Justice’s Administrative Enforcement Agency.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the