While all eyes have been on Nymphia Wind and Taiwan’s drag scene, the past couple of weeks have also seen two important advances in LGBTQ+ rights in Taiwan that might have slipped under the radar.
The first piece of news came on May 23, with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) announcing that it would seriously consider removing a ban on blood donation by men who have sex with men (MSM). Taiwan is one of very few advanced nations worldwide that maintains an indefinite ban, initially implemented due to concerns about the transmission of HIV.
The practice has been heavily criticized as discriminatory, as the risk has become very low with advancements in screening and blood testing. Although HIV transmission has historically been more prevalent among MSM, the real risk factor when it comes to blood donations is unsafe sexual practices.
A gay monogamous couple would pose a very low risk compared with a promiscuous heterosexual man, but it is the former who would be banned indefinitely from donating blood in Taiwan. As a comparison, the US in August last year removed all restrictions on monogamous gay couples. Before then, all MSM had to wait three months after having intercourse with another man to donate blood.
In 2018, the CDC proposed changing the rule to allow MSM to donate after a five-year deferral period — far more than the deferral period of a few months in other countries — but it was never implemented due to public opposition. However, now that new cases of HIV infection have been steadily dropping, falling to only 940 last year, the CDC felt the time is right to take the public temperature with a series of expert and public hearings to be held later this year.
It might still be in the early stages, but there is reason to believe it might be successful this time. Public sentiment toward LGBTQ+ issues has improved significantly since 2018, and the CDC has already presented data to back up its decision. If supplemented by a public awareness campaign, the unfair restriction could be lifted by the year’s end.
The second advancement came last week, with the Taipei High Administrative Court ruling in favor of a transgender man who applied to change his legal gender without having undergone gender-affirming surgery. It comes after another decision in 2021 in favor of a trans woman who made a similar appeal.
Like the blood donation rule, there is another antiquated and discriminatory rule on the books requiring people to present proof of surgical transition when applying to change their legal gender. In plaintiff Nemo’s (尼莫) case, although he had been taking male hormones for years, he was told that gender-affirming surgery would pose a life-threatening risk due to a previous medical procedure.
The court’s decision provides an important precedent that would allow cases to be treated on an individual basis. Hopefully the next step is recognizing that not everyone wants or is able to undergo expensive surgery to be identified as they want and already are. When that time comes, Taiwan can join the 50 other countries and territories that allow legal gender changes without proof of surgery.
They might be minor advancements, but every step is important on the road to equality. Taiwan earned its reputation as the most progressive place in Asia thanks to improvements such as these, pushed along by the tireless efforts of activists and the LGBTQ+ people who live openly and proudly every day.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS