As the West’s political leaders become increasingly preoccupied with the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, they risk losing their geopolitical influence in a small, but strategically significant Black Sea country: Georgia.
On April 29, in one of his rare public appearances, Bidzina Ivanishvili— the founder and de facto leader of the ruling Georgian Dream party and a reclusive billionaire — accused the US and the EU of being a Western “global war party” and meddling in Georgia’s internal affairs.
Taking a page from Russian President Vladimir Putin’s playbook, Ivanishvili vowed to reintroduce a law on “foreign agents,” which would label organizations receiving more than 20 percent of their funding from abroad as being under foreign influence. The Kremlin-style law would allow the government to eliminate non-governmental organizations working for democracy and the rule of law, suppress independent media and eradicate the opposition. Given this, the conclusion of Ivanishvili’s speech, in which he promised EU accession, sounded like an Orwellian joke.
Illustration: Yusha
The speech, which was quickly followed by the law’s passage on May 14, marked Georgia’s turn toward an autocratic regime similar to that of Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko. Tens of thousands of protesters, led by Georgia’s young people, have taken to the streets to express their dissent, and their numbers continue to grow, despite the government’s violent attacks on opposition politicians and demonstrators.
Georgia has been here before. The government first introduced a law on foreign agents in March last year, only to withdraw it following mass protests. Since then, Georgia was granted EU candidate status, which reassured many Georgians of their country’s European future. So why, given his seemingly pro-Western stance, did Ivanishvili make a U-turn now, ahead of parliamentary elections and when 90 percent of the population support EU accession?
The answer lies in Russia, where Ivanishvili amassed his fortune. As the linchpin of the so-called Middle Corridor, the shortest route connecting Europe to China and Central Asia, Georgia is a valuable prize for Putin.
The trajectory of the deep-sea port project in the Georgian town of Anaklia is illustrative. A joint venture between Georgia’s TBC Holding and US-based Conti International was awarded the contract to build and operate the port in 2016. However, the Georgian government terminated their contract in 2020, presumably under pressure from Russia, and is now considering bids from Chinese investors.
Still, preventing the West from making inroads into Georgia requires more than geopolitical maneuvering. The Georgian government must also turn to domestic repression to halt progress on the country’s EU and NATO bids.
It no longer matters whether Ivanishvili, who has been steering the country since 2012 (albeit mostly from the wings), has always been Russia’s Trojan horse or only recently decided that democracy does not serve his personal and political interests. The outcome remains the same: Putin has found a strong ally in Ivanishvili, who seems just as determined to distance Georgia from the West. This is a particularly dangerous objective as the fight for Ukraine’s future enters yet another decisive phase.
Russia is playing for high stakes. Burying Georgia’s European future would strengthen the Kremlin’s influence in the Caspian Sea region and Central Asia, and bring Putin closer to his objective of rebuilding the Russian empire. When the EU granted candidate status to Georgia in December last year, it sent a signal to its neighbors, especially Armenia and Azerbaijan, that the EU is committed to the long-term integration of the region. This has led Armenia — Russia’s strategic foothold in the Caucasus — to seek closer ties with the EU.
The Central Asian countries, rich in energy and mineral resources, have also expressed a growing interest in cooperating with the EU. Putin understands that crushing Georgia’s democratic and Western aspirations will likely put an end to these unwelcome developments.
As Georgians resist the re-Russification of their country, the West must also act. The US is moving in the right direction: Two bills that would support Georgia’s democracy and sanction politicians and officials attempting to destroy it have been introduced in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Moreover, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has announced that visa restrictions would apply to anyone who undermines democratic processes or institutions in Georgia.
However, to ensure that the proposed travel bans and financial sanctions are not empty threats, the US and the EU need to impose restrictions on Ivanishvili and the main players in his circle, including the henchmen who are intimidating demonstrators. This would offer the clearest possible sign of Western support for Georgia’s democracy.
Meanwhile, Georgia requires an unprecedented level of assistance, including an army of election observers, in the run-up to parliamentary polls in October.
The Georgian opposition parties have begun to form a pro-European front to challenge the ruling party, but they will need strong international support.
The upcoming elections are a referendum on Georgia’s European future, and if they are unfair, the West will likely lose its influence in the region. A coordinated US-EU policy is needed to ensure that Georgia’s democracy survives this crisis. A victory for Putin’s allies would have devastating consequences for both Georgians and the West.
Salome Samadashvili, a former head of Georgia’s Mission to the EU, is a member of Georgia’s parliament representing the pro-European opposition party Lelo for Georgia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS