At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, then-Mexico City mayor Claudia Sheinbaum made a point of always donning a face mask and firmly recommending others also do so as the virus devastated Mexico.
By contrast, her political patron, President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, refused to wear a mask, even after he fell ill, in line with his government’s guidelines that did not mandate mask use. Mexico suffered the fifth-worst COVID-19 death toll in the world.
That difference between the president and Sheinbaum, the firm favorite to win the Mexican presidential elections tomorrow, was seen by some as a point of tension and a small act of rebellion against her mentor, who cannot run for re-election by law. Sheinbaum denied it, saying the two were part of the same “project” to transform the country.
However, people close to Sheinbaum cite this anecdote as an example of how the former scientist would not govern as a “puppet” of Lopez Obrador, as her political opponents claim.
Instead, they say, she would veer away on key issues such as the environment and energy, security and even corruption, while maintaining the president’s principally state-led economic vision and key welfare programs.
“They have a collaborative relationship, it is not one of submission,” said one member of Sheinbaum’s team, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
“It’s very unfair that they say she will be a puppet, because in the five years of governing Mexico City she did totally different things to the president,” he added, citing investments in electric bus and train routes and the installation of solar panels.
Sheinbaum has run a cautious campaign, careful not to criticize Lopez Obrador, an outsized, polarizing figure who is both her mentor and the source of much of her electoral support.
A lack of detail around her government plans has also served her well with Mexico’s middle class and business community who have tended to project onto her hopes for a more moderate and pragmatic leader.
To what degree she will deviate from policies of Lopez Obrador is one of the key questions going into the elections, closely watched by investors after Lopez Obrador largely shut out private companies from key parts of the economy, such as power generation.
Analysts say Sheinbaum faces a delicate balancing act between her own policy goals and maintaining the legacy of Lopez Obrador who wields considerable influence in the ruling MORENA party.
“If she wins she will have an internal struggle between her genuine loyalty to Lopez Obrador and her reality of not having her own political capital because she does not have his strength,” said Agustin Basave, politician, academic and former congressman, who recently chaired the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution.
“The first years of her government could be limited,” Basave added, saying that Lopez Obrador would likely exert influence behind the scenes rather than publicly.
In a clue about Lopez Obrador’s continuing influence, Sheinbaum has indicated that several of his high-ranking officials would remain in their posts if she takes over, including Secretary of Finance Rogelio Ramirez de la O.
Two sources close to Sheinbaum’s camp say Lopez Obrador’s former foreign secretary, Marcelo Ebrard, as well as current Secretary of Security and Citizen Protection Rosa Rodriguez are likely to remain key players.
Analysts point to Secretary of the Interior Luisa Alcalde and Secretary of Economy Raquel Buenrrostro as also remaining important.
Another hint at Lopez Obrador’s expectations for Sheinbaum’s administration is the package of ambitious constitutional reforms he proposed in February knowing they had almost no chance of passing during his term, analysts said, adding that they were a blueprint for her administration.
Sheinbaum, meanwhile, has ruled out speculation there would be a “red telephone” to receive instructions from Lopez Obrador.
“I am the one who is going to govern,” she said.
Additional reporting by Diego Ore
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS