At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, then-Mexico City mayor Claudia Sheinbaum made a point of always donning a face mask and firmly recommending others also do so as the virus devastated Mexico.
By contrast, her political patron, President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, refused to wear a mask, even after he fell ill, in line with his government’s guidelines that did not mandate mask use. Mexico suffered the fifth-worst COVID-19 death toll in the world.
That difference between the president and Sheinbaum, the firm favorite to win the Mexican presidential elections tomorrow, was seen by some as a point of tension and a small act of rebellion against her mentor, who cannot run for re-election by law. Sheinbaum denied it, saying the two were part of the same “project” to transform the country.
However, people close to Sheinbaum cite this anecdote as an example of how the former scientist would not govern as a “puppet” of Lopez Obrador, as her political opponents claim.
Instead, they say, she would veer away on key issues such as the environment and energy, security and even corruption, while maintaining the president’s principally state-led economic vision and key welfare programs.
“They have a collaborative relationship, it is not one of submission,” said one member of Sheinbaum’s team, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
“It’s very unfair that they say she will be a puppet, because in the five years of governing Mexico City she did totally different things to the president,” he added, citing investments in electric bus and train routes and the installation of solar panels.
Sheinbaum has run a cautious campaign, careful not to criticize Lopez Obrador, an outsized, polarizing figure who is both her mentor and the source of much of her electoral support.
A lack of detail around her government plans has also served her well with Mexico’s middle class and business community who have tended to project onto her hopes for a more moderate and pragmatic leader.
To what degree she will deviate from policies of Lopez Obrador is one of the key questions going into the elections, closely watched by investors after Lopez Obrador largely shut out private companies from key parts of the economy, such as power generation.
Analysts say Sheinbaum faces a delicate balancing act between her own policy goals and maintaining the legacy of Lopez Obrador who wields considerable influence in the ruling MORENA party.
“If she wins she will have an internal struggle between her genuine loyalty to Lopez Obrador and her reality of not having her own political capital because she does not have his strength,” said Agustin Basave, politician, academic and former congressman, who recently chaired the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution.
“The first years of her government could be limited,” Basave added, saying that Lopez Obrador would likely exert influence behind the scenes rather than publicly.
In a clue about Lopez Obrador’s continuing influence, Sheinbaum has indicated that several of his high-ranking officials would remain in their posts if she takes over, including Secretary of Finance Rogelio Ramirez de la O.
Two sources close to Sheinbaum’s camp say Lopez Obrador’s former foreign secretary, Marcelo Ebrard, as well as current Secretary of Security and Citizen Protection Rosa Rodriguez are likely to remain key players.
Analysts point to Secretary of the Interior Luisa Alcalde and Secretary of Economy Raquel Buenrrostro as also remaining important.
Another hint at Lopez Obrador’s expectations for Sheinbaum’s administration is the package of ambitious constitutional reforms he proposed in February knowing they had almost no chance of passing during his term, analysts said, adding that they were a blueprint for her administration.
Sheinbaum, meanwhile, has ruled out speculation there would be a “red telephone” to receive instructions from Lopez Obrador.
“I am the one who is going to govern,” she said.
Additional reporting by Diego Ore
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
RSS