Hydrogen is the most abundant substance in the universe, and a crucial element in the creation of our most precious resource: water. Initiatives outlined by automakers last week are breathing new life into plans to use the gas as fuel. They are also a reminder that making the world run on hydrogen will need considerable support from diversified businesses such as North Asia’s storied conglomerates.
The most promising path to exploiting hydrogen is to store the gas in a tank, as you would gasoline, then feed it into a fuel cell where it combines with oxygen to create an electric current, with water as a byproduct. Put this in a car and you have a fuel-cell electric vehicle (EV). Recently, industry has turned to green hydrogen, created by running an electric current through water with an electrolyte. The machines that do this are called electrolyzers, and like battery EVs, they are only truly green if the original electricity source comes from renewables.
Parking an electrolyzer near a wind farm, solar array or hydroelectric dam would be ideal because you can use renewable energy to deliver clean electricity directly to the hydrogen-production facility. However, the gas would still need to be transported to refueling stations, possibly through natural gas pipelines.
The ultimate solution, the one that industry ought to strive for, is on-site extraction, storage and refueling. Such facilities could be tacked onto existing gas stations, but need not be. Since electrolysis equipment only requires water and electricity, there is more flexibility in placement. An alternative to electrolysis is to use organic waste by extracting hydrogen from rotting food or sewage.
Right now, few companies have any reason to invest in this infrastructure. Tesla Inc’s car-plus-recharging model is the exception to the rule, and shows us that end-to-end solutions are the best way to kickstart an entirely new transport ecosystem.
Existing oil suppliers and gas-station operators do not seem keen to push into the fuel-cell era, especially since there is barely any hydrogen vehicles on the road now. Just 223 were sold in the US in the first quarter, out of 3.8 million vehicles in total. It is also a stretch to expect traditional US auto companies such as General Motors Co or Ford Motor Co to step out of their wheelhouse into the fueling business. These firms are already struggling to manage their EV rollouts, with battery technology and supply proving major stumbling blocks.
Asian conglomerates might be the answer. Hyundai Motor Co, Honda Motor Co and Toyota Motor Corp each showed off hydrogen-power solutions at the Advanced Clean Transportation Expo in California last week. All three automakers are part of larger business empires — called chaebol in South Korea and keiretsu in Japan. Outside of their home countries, they are best known for making cars and motorbikes. However, their tentacles extend deep into other areas. Toyota, for example, has at least 17 companies in its group with affiliates that include a steelmaker, a textile supplier and a machine tool developer.
South Korea’s Hyundai might be the most diversified. It encompasses companies that build and service ships, produce electric motors and even supply robots. While splits and spinoffs over the years have diluted cross-shareholding and management have been diluted, the chaebol still benefits from a closer relationship among businesses in disparate industries than anything seen in Europe or North America. It also has a plan. Hyundai thinks it can leverage its conglomerate advantage to build out the entire fuel-cell supply chain “from hydrogen production and storage to logistics, transport and diverse applications.” Last year it put 30 of its heavy-duty XCIENT trucks on the road in California to haul freight from ports in Oakland and Richmond.
Building and driving the vehicle is the easy part. What companies like Hyundai are also attempting to do is create the infrastructure to extract, store and transport hydrogen. In South Korea, for example, a pilot project turns food waste into the clean gas, which is then stored locally for on-site refueling. By the end of this year, Hyundai expects to have another plant convert sewage into hydrogen.
Honda, which aims to have 40 percent of its global sales by 2030 come from EVs and fuel-cell vehicles, is also turning to its broad industry reach to make both cars and the fuel. This month the Japanese firm showcased a hydrogen fuel-cell-powered truck similar in size and capacity to Hyundai’s.
With battery electric vehicles getting cheaper, and combustion engines still the preferred choice, hydrogen’s window of opportunity is relatively small and closing fast. If this alternative technology is to get a foothold, it would need fully integrated suppliers that stand to profit from every link in the supply chain. That puts the burden on Asia’s chaebol and keiretsu to bring all their resources to bear if hydrogen is to have a shot of becoming part of our green-energy future.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of
RSS