Taiwan has seen a big change in how people view marriage, especially among Generation Z. As a member of this generation, I have observed a shift in how we perceive love, commitment and personal fulfillment.
My desire to share my views on marriage stems from Taiwan’s progress in marriage equality and social advancement. In 2019, Taiwan became the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage, making it increasingly friendly toward same-sex relationships.
Even though I could not vote in the referendum at that time, I still feel very proud because I know this journey was not easy. It followed years of protests, legal battles and advocacy efforts by the LGBTQ+ community and their allies. This milestone made me start thinking about what the true essence of marriage really is.
Growing up in Taiwan, I have seen the clash between traditional values and modern ideals play out in my own life and those of my peers. The pressure to conform to societal expectations of marriage and family life is obvious, yet many of us are questioning whether these conventions truly meet our personal desires and aspirations.
For me, the notion of marriage as a symbol of success or fulfillment feels outdated and restrictive. I believe that true happiness comes from pursuing our passions, nurturing personal growth and forming genuine connections with others — whether or not marriage is part of the picture.
The economic realities we face only worsen these tensions. With property prices soaring and job stability being uncertain, it is understandable that many people see the traditional concept of marrying early and starting a family as less feasible and less attractive. Some of my friends are focusing on their jobs and personal growth instead of thinking about marriage in the traditional sense. They think that having financial stability and feeling fulfilled personally are the most important things.
Additionally, the rise in women’s education and job opportunities has gradually freed them from traditional gender roles. With more women pursuing higher education and careers, traditional gender roles are being challenged, leading to relationships based on equality and mutual respect.
I think love and marriage are personal rights for everyone. Decisions about whether to marry, when to marry, who to marry and whether to have children should be seen as personal freedoms.
The rise of dating apps and social media has also reshaped the way we approach relationships. While these platforms offer access to potential partners, they also breed a culture of instant satisfaction and superficial connections. As a result, many of us are redefining what it means to find love in the digital age, seeking deeper connections and meaningful experiences beyond the swipe of a screen.
As Taiwan continues to evolve, so too do our perceptions of marriage and commitment. While some might view this shift as a break from tradition, I see it as an opportunity for growth and self-discovery. By challenging societal norms and embracing our individuality, we are trying to find a way for a more open and real approach to love and relationships. The one that celebrates diversity and empowers each of us to live the life we want.
Through my own experiences and conversations with friends and family, I have learned that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to marriage. Each of us has to find our own way, guided by what we believe in and what we want out of life. Even though there is always pressure to do things a certain way, I am confident that my generation will keep moving forward, finding what marriage means to us and exploring healthier relationship views.
Wu Sih-sian is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS