Taiwan has seen a big change in how people view marriage, especially among Generation Z. As a member of this generation, I have observed a shift in how we perceive love, commitment and personal fulfillment.
My desire to share my views on marriage stems from Taiwan’s progress in marriage equality and social advancement. In 2019, Taiwan became the first Asian country to legalize same-sex marriage, making it increasingly friendly toward same-sex relationships.
Even though I could not vote in the referendum at that time, I still feel very proud because I know this journey was not easy. It followed years of protests, legal battles and advocacy efforts by the LGBTQ+ community and their allies. This milestone made me start thinking about what the true essence of marriage really is.
Growing up in Taiwan, I have seen the clash between traditional values and modern ideals play out in my own life and those of my peers. The pressure to conform to societal expectations of marriage and family life is obvious, yet many of us are questioning whether these conventions truly meet our personal desires and aspirations.
For me, the notion of marriage as a symbol of success or fulfillment feels outdated and restrictive. I believe that true happiness comes from pursuing our passions, nurturing personal growth and forming genuine connections with others — whether or not marriage is part of the picture.
The economic realities we face only worsen these tensions. With property prices soaring and job stability being uncertain, it is understandable that many people see the traditional concept of marrying early and starting a family as less feasible and less attractive. Some of my friends are focusing on their jobs and personal growth instead of thinking about marriage in the traditional sense. They think that having financial stability and feeling fulfilled personally are the most important things.
Additionally, the rise in women’s education and job opportunities has gradually freed them from traditional gender roles. With more women pursuing higher education and careers, traditional gender roles are being challenged, leading to relationships based on equality and mutual respect.
I think love and marriage are personal rights for everyone. Decisions about whether to marry, when to marry, who to marry and whether to have children should be seen as personal freedoms.
The rise of dating apps and social media has also reshaped the way we approach relationships. While these platforms offer access to potential partners, they also breed a culture of instant satisfaction and superficial connections. As a result, many of us are redefining what it means to find love in the digital age, seeking deeper connections and meaningful experiences beyond the swipe of a screen.
As Taiwan continues to evolve, so too do our perceptions of marriage and commitment. While some might view this shift as a break from tradition, I see it as an opportunity for growth and self-discovery. By challenging societal norms and embracing our individuality, we are trying to find a way for a more open and real approach to love and relationships. The one that celebrates diversity and empowers each of us to live the life we want.
Through my own experiences and conversations with friends and family, I have learned that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to marriage. Each of us has to find our own way, guided by what we believe in and what we want out of life. Even though there is always pressure to do things a certain way, I am confident that my generation will keep moving forward, finding what marriage means to us and exploring healthier relationship views.
Wu Sih-sian is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS