Leaders of Japan, South Korea and China on Monday met in Seoul in what Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強) hailed as a “new start.” The trilateral summit, between Li, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was the first for the three nations since 2019. It concluded with a six-point joint statement. It was never expected to produce any major developments, but has been welcomed nevertheless as a pressure gauge allowing for the reduction of regional tensions.
The elephant in the room, certainly in terms of the promotion of regional peace and reducing impediments to trade and prosperity, was the issue of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) aggressive behavior in the Taiwan Strait. Kishida had spoken of this in a bilateral meeting with Li on Sunday, in which he mentioned “the recent military situation,” referring to the CCP’s “Joint Sword-2024A” military exercise launched around Taiwan just days after President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration.
The meeting also comes as an early draft of the Japanese Ministry of Defense’s annual report says that the military balance in the Taiwan Strait tilting in China’s favor is sparking global concern, several Japanese media outlets reported. However, the Taiwan Strait issue did not make it into the joint statement.
During the summit, Li spoke of the importance of separating politics from economic and trade issues. For him to insist that the two be disentangled as a matter of principle is strange given the economic coercion that Beijing regularly uses against other countries. Just ask Taiwan, Australia and Lithuania, to give only three examples.
For the CCP, politics, economics and national security can never be separated. It agreed to this summit with Japan and South Korea at this time not only because of its own economic woes, but also because of increasing concern over the two countries’ closeness and alignment with the US in security. The CCP is well aware that if it does not succeed in loosening the ties between the three, it risks being constrained in its goal of regional domination.
Then there is the matter of regional peace. During the summit, the three nations were mainly concerned with Northeast Asia, and the bombastic antics of North Korea and the planned missile launch that it announced just prior to the meeting. Kishida and Yoon sought Li’s assistance in bringing to bear China’s influence over North Korea. However, discussing maintaining peace in Northeast Asia while ratcheting up tensions in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait makes no sense at all.
During his inaugural speech, Lai offered an olive branch to the CCP, calling for dialogue while taking a firm stance on Taiwan’s sovereignty and the right of self-determination of the people he had been elected to represent and protect. The CCP responded with “Joint Sword-2024A” as “punishment.”
Monday’s trilateral summit was hailed for reducing tensions in the region, which is important in the present circumstances.
Why is the CCP so insistent on rebuffing any offers of dialogue from Lai? If it is so indignant about Lai’s choice of words in his inaugural speech, why not sit down with him and seek some kind of consensus on how the two governments wish to proceed amicably
There will be no “new start” in cross-strait relations, because the CCP has no intention of budging a single inch.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS