Leaders of Japan, South Korea and China on Monday met in Seoul in what Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強) hailed as a “new start.” The trilateral summit, between Li, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol was the first for the three nations since 2019. It concluded with a six-point joint statement. It was never expected to produce any major developments, but has been welcomed nevertheless as a pressure gauge allowing for the reduction of regional tensions.
The elephant in the room, certainly in terms of the promotion of regional peace and reducing impediments to trade and prosperity, was the issue of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) aggressive behavior in the Taiwan Strait. Kishida had spoken of this in a bilateral meeting with Li on Sunday, in which he mentioned “the recent military situation,” referring to the CCP’s “Joint Sword-2024A” military exercise launched around Taiwan just days after President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration.
The meeting also comes as an early draft of the Japanese Ministry of Defense’s annual report says that the military balance in the Taiwan Strait tilting in China’s favor is sparking global concern, several Japanese media outlets reported. However, the Taiwan Strait issue did not make it into the joint statement.
During the summit, Li spoke of the importance of separating politics from economic and trade issues. For him to insist that the two be disentangled as a matter of principle is strange given the economic coercion that Beijing regularly uses against other countries. Just ask Taiwan, Australia and Lithuania, to give only three examples.
For the CCP, politics, economics and national security can never be separated. It agreed to this summit with Japan and South Korea at this time not only because of its own economic woes, but also because of increasing concern over the two countries’ closeness and alignment with the US in security. The CCP is well aware that if it does not succeed in loosening the ties between the three, it risks being constrained in its goal of regional domination.
Then there is the matter of regional peace. During the summit, the three nations were mainly concerned with Northeast Asia, and the bombastic antics of North Korea and the planned missile launch that it announced just prior to the meeting. Kishida and Yoon sought Li’s assistance in bringing to bear China’s influence over North Korea. However, discussing maintaining peace in Northeast Asia while ratcheting up tensions in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait makes no sense at all.
During his inaugural speech, Lai offered an olive branch to the CCP, calling for dialogue while taking a firm stance on Taiwan’s sovereignty and the right of self-determination of the people he had been elected to represent and protect. The CCP responded with “Joint Sword-2024A” as “punishment.”
Monday’s trilateral summit was hailed for reducing tensions in the region, which is important in the present circumstances.
Why is the CCP so insistent on rebuffing any offers of dialogue from Lai? If it is so indignant about Lai’s choice of words in his inaugural speech, why not sit down with him and seek some kind of consensus on how the two governments wish to proceed amicably
There will be no “new start” in cross-strait relations, because the CCP has no intention of budging a single inch.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS