As the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) continued to promote their “contempt of the legislature” bills and made a farce of legislative procedure, the public took to the streets to protest, just as it did 10 years ago with the Sunflower movement.
The UK Parliament possesses high constitutional status and great authority, but it cannot abuse its powers.
First of all, a legislative reform bill is not a small deal. The proposal should be publicized in the first reading and drafted as a green or white paper for prior public consultation. The principle of the proposal should be clearly stated and submitted for legislative debate after the public reaches a consensus.
It is absurd that KMT legislators should be allowed to comply with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) wishes and create such chaos in the legislature.
In the UK, in certain circumstances, parliament has the right to summon specific people and ask them to provide evidence or submit documents before a session. Only select committees that have passed the resolution possess this authority, and the committee would give people summoned parliamentary immunity so that they can speak freely.
If parliament wants to prosecute someone, the approval of a prosecutor is necessary. It is unreasonable for Taiwanese legislators to be able to prosecute those who refuse to obey.
The legislature needs reform, but as former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) has said, that reform should not introduce new crimes such as “contempt of legislature” and forget the basic responsibilities of lawmakers.
In addition, in the UK, the person elected to be the speaker of the House of Commons immediately withdraws from their party to show neutrality. Also, parties would not nominate candidates to compete for the seat of the speaker’s constituency.
In Taiwan, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has his own political stance and remains in the KMT, and this lacks neutrality. For anyone familiar with the Westminster system, it is preposterous that Han, in his current status, could become legislative speaker.
With the nonsensical proposals and the chaos, the legislature has lost its credibility in the eyes of the public. The KMT and the TPP should withdraw the proposals, or the legislature might face dissolution and realignment.
In many Western nations, if lawmakers behave unreasonably and uncontrollably, parliament would be dissolved and re-elected. Also, a constitutional reform committee would be established to let parties and the public discuss how to improve the parliament.
Although discontentment from the public has yet to reach this level, whether the legislature would soon face dissolution is hard to tell.
Martin Oei is a Hong Kong-born British political commentator based in Germany and a member of the UK’s Conservative Party.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS