The Indonesian government should be deeply concerned about China’s recent military exercises near Taiwan, as they are purportedly intended to send a “warning” to the elected government of Taiwan led by President William Lai (賴清德).
The action is particularly alarming because Taiwan is home to approximately 350,000 Indonesian workers, who are employed in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors.
Data from the Taipei Economic and Trade Office in Surabaya show that there are 30,000 Indonesians residing in Taiwan who have married Taiwanese, while 20,000 Indonesians are studying in Taiwan.
The data highlight the importance that Indonesia engages in efforts to prevent zero-sum game scenarios in the Taiwan Strait, which would have severe adverse consequences for Indonesia.
Indonesia, recognized as a diplomatic intermediary in global affairs, has the capability to engage in mediating this potential situation of conflicting interests. Indonesia possesses an abundance of capital due to its highly cordial connections with the two parties.
Indonesia’s commitment to preserving strong relations with China is accompanied by a deep respect for its “one China” policy. Nevertheless, Indonesia is highly proficient in implementing its open and assertive foreign policy. It has an Indonesian Trade and Economic Office in Taipei, which can be considered a de facto Indonesian embassy.
An effective approach for Indonesia to adhere to the “one China” policy is to engage in dialogue, albeit with the need for assertive persuasion.
Nevertheless, this pursuit remains viable due to the explicit declaration made by Lai during his inauguration speech. He affirmed that Taiwan would adhere to the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, indicating that it would persist with its “peaceful” strategy.
Lai underscored the significance of this approach by emphasizing that “peace is invaluable and warfare yields no victor.”
Lai’s statement can serve as a valuable resource for Indonesia in urging China to abstain from military aggression, which would undoubtedly have severe consequences for all parties involved, including Indonesia. The potential losses resulting from a military annexation are unimaginable.
Indonesia can initiate discourse by highlighting the amicable rapport between Indonesia and China thus far, substantiated by successful collaborations across several domains.
China has emerged as Indonesia’s primary trading partner, with trade value estimated to be US$127 billion this year. China will undoubtedly take into account the advice from Indonesia, its closest ally in Southeast Asia, due to the strong emphasis on the positive relationship between the two countries.
Indonesia can propose constructive dialogue to China, particularly by raising the issue at the ASEAN forum. This is especially important because many citizens of ASEAN members, such as the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia, also have a presence in Taiwan. By engaging in dialogue, Indonesia’s message would be impactful and China would be motivated to listen.
China, being concerned about its interests in Southeast Asia, would not want its military activities in the Taiwan Strait to disrupt the region. Regarding other aspects, it is desirable that the situation in the Taiwan Strait remains stable and that China’s sincere commitment to maintaining the current state of affairs can also be achieved.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia in Kedah state.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS