On Thursday last week, China conducted large-scale military drills around Taiwan, jeopardizing peace and stability in the region. The air and maritime drills, formally named “Joint Sword-2024A,” came three days after President William Lai (賴清德) was sworn in.
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) intentions behind these exercises are clear: to intimidate Taiwan and consolidate its geopolitical influence in the western Pacific.
The drills are also designed to send a message to key players in the region — namely the US and Japan — about China’s “inviolable sovereignty” and to discourage other countries from meddling in China’s “internal affairs.” The drills, and the potential dangers that accompany them, can be further analyzed from several perspectives.
First, the sheer scale of the exercises — involving multiple branches of the military from the Eastern Theater Command — emphasizes China’s determination to intimidate Taiwan militarily and warn Taiwanese independence forces against challenging the CCP’s “bottom line.”
The CCP seems to be adopting a “kill two birds with one stone” strategy: Beyond the obvious goal of tightening its grip on the Taiwan Strait, the CCP was using the opportunity to show off its strength and exert pressure on the US and Japan. This strategy might heighten the risk of conflict.
Second, the drills are a direct move to counter Taiwan’s pro-independence forces and joint combat exercises, highlighting an increased aggressiveness in the CCP’s stance toward Taiwan. China’s warning extends to all “outside forces,” and is a direct provocation to the US and Japan.
The CCP aims to assert its strategic influence in the region and challenge the US and Japan’s dominance in the western Pacific, a move likely to intensify regional geopolitical rivalries and increase the risk of military confrontation.
Thirdly, the pent-up tension in the region could create a vicious cycle further prompting the CCP to push for military action. If more drills such as “Joint Sword-2024B or C” were to be carried out, this would make the situation in the Taiwan Strait go from bad to worse.
Other countries in the region might feel compelled to affect their military expenditure in response. Rising military costs would not only impact economic and social development, but could also make conflict more likely, endangering global peace and stability.
The military drills put China’s ambition and wider intentions in plain view. By seeking to exert its influence on the regional landscape, China is turning the area into a geopolitical battleground.
In confronting the CCP military threat, nations should remain alert and bolster cooperation and coordination on security and defense matters. The international community should condemn the CCP’s military provocations and apply diplomatic and economic pressure to encourage a change in its attitude toward Taiwan. Rational dialogue and peaceful solutions are essential to reduce the risk of conflict, safeguard peace and promote development.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS