On Thursday last week, China conducted large-scale military drills around Taiwan, jeopardizing peace and stability in the region. The air and maritime drills, formally named “Joint Sword-2024A,” came three days after President William Lai (賴清德) was sworn in.
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) intentions behind these exercises are clear: to intimidate Taiwan and consolidate its geopolitical influence in the western Pacific.
The drills are also designed to send a message to key players in the region — namely the US and Japan — about China’s “inviolable sovereignty” and to discourage other countries from meddling in China’s “internal affairs.” The drills, and the potential dangers that accompany them, can be further analyzed from several perspectives.
First, the sheer scale of the exercises — involving multiple branches of the military from the Eastern Theater Command — emphasizes China’s determination to intimidate Taiwan militarily and warn Taiwanese independence forces against challenging the CCP’s “bottom line.”
The CCP seems to be adopting a “kill two birds with one stone” strategy: Beyond the obvious goal of tightening its grip on the Taiwan Strait, the CCP was using the opportunity to show off its strength and exert pressure on the US and Japan. This strategy might heighten the risk of conflict.
Second, the drills are a direct move to counter Taiwan’s pro-independence forces and joint combat exercises, highlighting an increased aggressiveness in the CCP’s stance toward Taiwan. China’s warning extends to all “outside forces,” and is a direct provocation to the US and Japan.
The CCP aims to assert its strategic influence in the region and challenge the US and Japan’s dominance in the western Pacific, a move likely to intensify regional geopolitical rivalries and increase the risk of military confrontation.
Thirdly, the pent-up tension in the region could create a vicious cycle further prompting the CCP to push for military action. If more drills such as “Joint Sword-2024B or C” were to be carried out, this would make the situation in the Taiwan Strait go from bad to worse.
Other countries in the region might feel compelled to affect their military expenditure in response. Rising military costs would not only impact economic and social development, but could also make conflict more likely, endangering global peace and stability.
The military drills put China’s ambition and wider intentions in plain view. By seeking to exert its influence on the regional landscape, China is turning the area into a geopolitical battleground.
In confronting the CCP military threat, nations should remain alert and bolster cooperation and coordination on security and defense matters. The international community should condemn the CCP’s military provocations and apply diplomatic and economic pressure to encourage a change in its attitude toward Taiwan. Rational dialogue and peaceful solutions are essential to reduce the risk of conflict, safeguard peace and promote development.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS