On Thursday last week, China conducted large-scale military drills around Taiwan, jeopardizing peace and stability in the region. The air and maritime drills, formally named “Joint Sword-2024A,” came three days after President William Lai (賴清德) was sworn in.
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) intentions behind these exercises are clear: to intimidate Taiwan and consolidate its geopolitical influence in the western Pacific.
The drills are also designed to send a message to key players in the region — namely the US and Japan — about China’s “inviolable sovereignty” and to discourage other countries from meddling in China’s “internal affairs.” The drills, and the potential dangers that accompany them, can be further analyzed from several perspectives.
First, the sheer scale of the exercises — involving multiple branches of the military from the Eastern Theater Command — emphasizes China’s determination to intimidate Taiwan militarily and warn Taiwanese independence forces against challenging the CCP’s “bottom line.”
The CCP seems to be adopting a “kill two birds with one stone” strategy: Beyond the obvious goal of tightening its grip on the Taiwan Strait, the CCP was using the opportunity to show off its strength and exert pressure on the US and Japan. This strategy might heighten the risk of conflict.
Second, the drills are a direct move to counter Taiwan’s pro-independence forces and joint combat exercises, highlighting an increased aggressiveness in the CCP’s stance toward Taiwan. China’s warning extends to all “outside forces,” and is a direct provocation to the US and Japan.
The CCP aims to assert its strategic influence in the region and challenge the US and Japan’s dominance in the western Pacific, a move likely to intensify regional geopolitical rivalries and increase the risk of military confrontation.
Thirdly, the pent-up tension in the region could create a vicious cycle further prompting the CCP to push for military action. If more drills such as “Joint Sword-2024B or C” were to be carried out, this would make the situation in the Taiwan Strait go from bad to worse.
Other countries in the region might feel compelled to affect their military expenditure in response. Rising military costs would not only impact economic and social development, but could also make conflict more likely, endangering global peace and stability.
The military drills put China’s ambition and wider intentions in plain view. By seeking to exert its influence on the regional landscape, China is turning the area into a geopolitical battleground.
In confronting the CCP military threat, nations should remain alert and bolster cooperation and coordination on security and defense matters. The international community should condemn the CCP’s military provocations and apply diplomatic and economic pressure to encourage a change in its attitude toward Taiwan. Rational dialogue and peaceful solutions are essential to reduce the risk of conflict, safeguard peace and promote development.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Gabrielle Killick
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS