Newly appointed National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Minister Wu Cheng-wen (吳誠文) and his deputies met with the local press corps for the first time on Wednesday last week after President William Lai (賴清德) and Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), as well as the new Cabinet led by Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) were sworn into office on Monday. On Thursday, the NSTC appointees answered questions at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Education and Culture Committee.
On the two occasions, Wu said that the mission of the council — a top government agency guiding the nation’s development in science and technology — is to expand Taiwan’s technological advancement and economic development to the entire society and achieve “balanced and rapid” growth. He said the council would pursue greater cross-departmental and inter-ministerial cooperation to apply artificial intelligence (AI) and digitalization to all industries and propose an action plan within three months, and that transforming the machine tool industry into smart manufacturing would be one of its first tasks.
Wu said that transforming traditional industries and services would help solve the nation’s labor shortage and ensure balanced regional development. However, he also said that an important mission of the council is to provide long-term assistance and resources for basic research. Wu said that the council would never sacrifice academic development for industrial advancement.
It is clear that almost all of the policy priorities revolve around the local semiconductor industry and the information and communications technology (ICT) industry — two of the nation’s pillar industries, while enhancing Taiwan’s edge in science and technology industry is the council’s top priority.
However, it is still unclear what the council would do to improve the nation’s basic research. This highlights a perennial problem of Taiwan’s science and technology development in that resource allocation is heavily tilted toward industrial technology, with limited investment in basic research.
The most recent available statistics compiled by the council showed that research and development (R&D) spending nationwide totaled NT$898 billion (US$27.9 billion) in 2022, accounting for 3.96 percent of Taiwan’s GDP, the highest ever.
Of the R&D expenditure, technology development totaled NT$654 billion, accounting for 72.83 percent of the total, while about NT$175.4 billion went to applied research, or 19.53 percent. However, basic research only amounted to NT$68.5 billion, or 7.63 percent of total R&D spending that year.
Funding for basic research in other major economies generally accounts for 10 percent or more of their national R&D budgets. If only a small portion of the nation’s overall spending on scientific and technological development goes toward fundamental research, Taiwan’s long-term competitiveness could be undermined.
Unfortunately, the issue of more government resources being invested in basic research that the private sector cannot provide, and that competent people must be put in charge of the work, remains unresolved, despite several changes of leadership at the council and its predecessors, the National Science Council (from 1969 to 2014) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (from 2014 to 2022).
Over the past 30 to 40 years, the nation’s high-tech industry has excelled and become a major hub for semiconductor and ICT industries. However, with increasingly fierce competition from other countries and the rapid development of new technologies, pressure on the local high-tech industry is increasing fast.
Against this backdrop, the council’s new leadership should provide a clear vision on investment in basic research, as scientific and technological innovation, and knowledge accumulation are the foundation of sustainable industrial development.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS