When exactly did Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) join the blue camp? He used to stand with the young people, but now he turns his back on them.
Huang has been urging the legislative reform bills proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and TPP to be passed.
When the bills were first proposed, I expected them to help replace the chaotic chamber with a more self-disciplined one.
However, instead of trying to introduce order into chaos, the opposition is attempting a power grab, overriding government officials and even Taiwan’s elected head of state.
The bills cover a series of outrageous regulations, and that is why the KMT and TPP resist openly discussing the details.
Legislative reforms are just an excuse. The KMT and the TPP’s real intention is to expand the power of lawmakers. They are brazenly moving the goalposts.
Those who refuse a demand by the legislature or delay their response, conceal information or provide false statements during an investigation or when it reviews documents can be fined NT$10,000 to NT$100,000, according to a change to Article 48, Paragraph 2 of the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) being proposed by the KMT and the TPP.
Who do the KMT and TPP think they are? Legislators have no right to do that.
Sadly, if the amendments proceed, lawmakers would be given the authority to control the public. That would be an exploitation of human rights, in which politicians are forever superior to the public and are able to punish anyone as they wish.
That is no different than the White Terror era.
We all know that the Legislative Yuan is a place where political parties confront each other. Considering this, lawmakers are not necessarily required to behave in a regulated norm; their ridiculous or stupid words and behaviors are even, to some degree, countenanced by the public.
If lawmakers are given so much room to express their ideas, why is the public not given the equivalent rights to reject an unreasonable query on providing information?
We often worry that the executive power overrides other authorities under a constitutional system. Surprisingly, in Taiwan, it is the legislative floor that seeks to monopolize the governing. That would definitely be a “remarkable” page in the constitutional system.
The Constitution of the Republic of China says that the Legislative Yuan does not have investigative rights. If the KMT and the TPP “empower” themselves to investigate the public by means of making a law, they would ruin the separation of powers.
Even if the legislature is given the right to investigate the public, there should be some limitations. For instance, lawmakers can ask a person to testify in court or to provide information, but they should never be allowed to force anyone to do so.
If a person refuses to comply with the request, the Legislative Yuan could propose a motion to the court to subpoena that person as a witness or to provide evidence.
In terms of fines, the Legislative Yuan should also file a motion to the court to impose sanctions, and the decisions should not be made by the Legislative Yuan itself.
Nonetheless, the KMT and the TPP are trying to give the legislature the ultimate power to impose a sanction only based on resolution in the plenary sitting, but judgement by the courts. Are they trying to bully the public?
Liu Che-chia is secretary-general of the Sovereign State for Formosa and the Pescadores Party.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
US president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday named US Representative Mike Waltz, a vocal supporter of arms sales to Taiwan who has called China an “existential threat,” as his national security advisor, and on Thursday named US Senator Marco Rubio, founding member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China — a global, cross-party alliance to address the challenges that China poses to the rules-based order — as his secretary of state. Trump’s appointments, including US Representative Elise Stefanik as US ambassador to the UN, who has been a strong supporter of Taiwan in the US Congress, and Robert Lighthizer as US trade
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
RSS