Tens of thousands of flights take off and land without incident every day, all around the world. So, when something tragic does happen, the world’s eyes become glued to the story — especially if it reveals the deadly side of an extremely common flight experience.
One man was killed and many others were injured when a Singapore Airlines flight encountered severe turbulence en route to Singapore from London on Tuesday. The airplane, a Boeing 777-300ER, had to make an emergency landing in Bangkok. The deceased had a heart condition, which officials think might be behind his death.
We do not yet know exactly what caused the agitated air currents, and an investigation is underway. It is currently the monsoon season in Southeast Asia, and the resulting stormy skies might have contributed to the turbulence experienced by the plane. However, we would be foolish to ignore the role that the climate crisis is playing in making air travel choppier.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
Most commonly caused by mountains, storms and jet streams, turbulence can be described simply as rough air. At its mildest, an aircraft might only experience slight erratic changes in altitude, but at the severe end, turbulence can cause large abrupt changes in the altitude and angle of the plane. Extreme turbulence could even cause structural damage to the body of the aircraft, although modern planes are built to withstand a lot.
In the case of mountains and storms, rough air is fairly easy to avoid, but it is possible to bump into turbulence where there are no clouds in sight. This clear-air turbulence is impossible to see or predict, but can cause damage to the aircraft and those inside. These sudden unexpected jolts are the most dangerous, as they can occur while passengers and staff are moving around. Last month, a man broke his leg as he returned from the toilet when an Air New Zealand flight to Auckland from Bali hit some turbulence and suddenly “dropped.” It is the sort of thing that might keep a pilot up at night — and it has been getting worse.
As our planet’s atmosphere warms, wind shears — variations in wind direction or speed — within jet streams are increasing and therefore strengthening clear-air turbulence.
In the past 40 years, severe clear-air turbulence increased to 27.4 hours in 2020 from 17.7 hours in 1979 for an average point over the North Atlantic, a University of Reading study last year showed.
Last year, I wrote about the ways in which the need to decarbonize flying was going to make air travel more expensive. However, it is clear that large investments are needed to help aviation cope with the meteorological effects of climate change, too.
Aircrafts are designed to withstand the worst that turbulence might throw at them.
Many of the aircraft that would be flying in the second half of the century are currently being designed, so work ought to be done to determine whether projections for turbulence necessitate any design or operational changes, researchers said in a study in 2017.
The US National Transportation Safety Board in a 2021 report made 24 recommendations aimed at reducing the incidence of turbulence accidents and associated injuries, including having flight attendants — who are seriously injured more often than passengers — be seated and belted earlier during the descent phase
More significant investments should also be made into remote sensing of clear-air turbulence and improved forecasts. On the detection front, there is promise being found in updated radar systems, including laser-based radar and a new type of infrasound microphone developed by NASA.
Any investments would be worth it for the safety and comfort of passengers alone, but aviation executives would also be happy to know that the investments could lead to savings — or at least stop potential losses from escalating. After all, turbulence is not cheap.
The cost of choppy air to US airlines is estimated to be as much as US$500 million annually, thanks to injuries, aircraft damage and flight delays, the US National Center for Atmospheric Research said. That would only shoot up, as severe turbulence increases.
In a way, aviation is its own worst enemy: What it contributes in greenhouse gas emissions, it gets back in heightened dangers, costs and difficulties. The industry — and its passengers — need to buckle up.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
On the last day of the extended legislative session on Friday last week, the Legislative Yuan, with a slight majority held by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), continued to refuse to review the government’s annual budget for this year, which is already overdue. It was the first time in Taiwan’s constitutional history that the government budget was not reviewed in its supposed legislative session. Instead, the opposition rushed to pass three controversial bills, which many people have criticized as self-serving. Since the Executive Yuan submitted its annual budget proposal to the Legislative Yuan in August last
RSS