Tens of thousands of flights take off and land without incident every day, all around the world. So, when something tragic does happen, the world’s eyes become glued to the story — especially if it reveals the deadly side of an extremely common flight experience.
One man was killed and many others were injured when a Singapore Airlines flight encountered severe turbulence en route to Singapore from London on Tuesday. The airplane, a Boeing 777-300ER, had to make an emergency landing in Bangkok. The deceased had a heart condition, which officials think might be behind his death.
We do not yet know exactly what caused the agitated air currents, and an investigation is underway. It is currently the monsoon season in Southeast Asia, and the resulting stormy skies might have contributed to the turbulence experienced by the plane. However, we would be foolish to ignore the role that the climate crisis is playing in making air travel choppier.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
Most commonly caused by mountains, storms and jet streams, turbulence can be described simply as rough air. At its mildest, an aircraft might only experience slight erratic changes in altitude, but at the severe end, turbulence can cause large abrupt changes in the altitude and angle of the plane. Extreme turbulence could even cause structural damage to the body of the aircraft, although modern planes are built to withstand a lot.
In the case of mountains and storms, rough air is fairly easy to avoid, but it is possible to bump into turbulence where there are no clouds in sight. This clear-air turbulence is impossible to see or predict, but can cause damage to the aircraft and those inside. These sudden unexpected jolts are the most dangerous, as they can occur while passengers and staff are moving around. Last month, a man broke his leg as he returned from the toilet when an Air New Zealand flight to Auckland from Bali hit some turbulence and suddenly “dropped.” It is the sort of thing that might keep a pilot up at night — and it has been getting worse.
As our planet’s atmosphere warms, wind shears — variations in wind direction or speed — within jet streams are increasing and therefore strengthening clear-air turbulence.
In the past 40 years, severe clear-air turbulence increased to 27.4 hours in 2020 from 17.7 hours in 1979 for an average point over the North Atlantic, a University of Reading study last year showed.
Last year, I wrote about the ways in which the need to decarbonize flying was going to make air travel more expensive. However, it is clear that large investments are needed to help aviation cope with the meteorological effects of climate change, too.
Aircrafts are designed to withstand the worst that turbulence might throw at them.
Many of the aircraft that would be flying in the second half of the century are currently being designed, so work ought to be done to determine whether projections for turbulence necessitate any design or operational changes, researchers said in a study in 2017.
The US National Transportation Safety Board in a 2021 report made 24 recommendations aimed at reducing the incidence of turbulence accidents and associated injuries, including having flight attendants — who are seriously injured more often than passengers — be seated and belted earlier during the descent phase
More significant investments should also be made into remote sensing of clear-air turbulence and improved forecasts. On the detection front, there is promise being found in updated radar systems, including laser-based radar and a new type of infrasound microphone developed by NASA.
Any investments would be worth it for the safety and comfort of passengers alone, but aviation executives would also be happy to know that the investments could lead to savings — or at least stop potential losses from escalating. After all, turbulence is not cheap.
The cost of choppy air to US airlines is estimated to be as much as US$500 million annually, thanks to injuries, aircraft damage and flight delays, the US National Center for Atmospheric Research said. That would only shoot up, as severe turbulence increases.
In a way, aviation is its own worst enemy: What it contributes in greenhouse gas emissions, it gets back in heightened dangers, costs and difficulties. The industry — and its passengers — need to buckle up.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS