New bills create a monster
One of my neighbors is a high-school student. He mentioned to me how surprised he was that the legislators of the blue and white camps would vote on draft amendments without discussion first, because even in a class meeting at high-school, every proposal that students make needs to be discussed among all members of the class before it is put to a vote. This is democratic literacy at its most basic, so why is it that high-school students appear to be more “literate” than opposition camp lawmakers?
Not long ago, opposition lawmakers pushed through five draft amendments to expand the legislature’s power. Some of them were not even clear about the content of the amendments, and blindly followed the instructions of the caucus whips to force a vote just to pass the bills. Such blatant disregard of legislative procedure not only hurts the democratic system established in Taiwan for many years, but also makes the people who voted for the opposition lawmakers disappointed and even angry.
Among the amendments recently passed by opposition lawmakers that could have the biggest impact on people’s freedom and rights are punishment for officials deemed to have committed “contempt of the legislature” by making false statements or withholding key information, and the legislature’s power of investigation.
Can you imagine that in the future, an official of the central government might be sentenced under the Criminal Code if he or she makes a few unpleasant remarks to a lawmaker during a question-and-answer session at the Legislative Yuan? Do you understand that a private enterprise might be unable to refuse when asked by the legislature to hand over its books or files because of these investigative powers?
After the passage of the amendments, would the legislature not become a monster with unchecked power?
Yeh Yu-cheng
Taipei
Time to protect democracy
In an environment where the international situation has intensified, Taiwan faces multiple threats from China and, in particular, infiltration and espionage operations. Several cases have surfaced in recent years that shed light on the severity of the problem. There are serious examples of contraventions of the National Security Act (國安法), including by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin’s (徐巧芯) alleged divulging of secrets pertaining to Ukraine; Lee Shang-tien (李尚典) and Kuo Pei-chin (郭佩金) acting as mules for election funding from China for a KMT candidate in Hualien County; and retired air force colonel Liu Sheng-ju’s (劉聖恕) attempt to set up a spy network in the military.
The National Security Act, Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) and the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法) are meant to safeguard national security. However, these laws have their limitations. Taiwan must have an “agents law” to advance the nation’s resistance against Chinese Communist Party infiltration and spying, bolster the effectiveness of laws already on the books, halt any form of espionage and guarantee Taiwan’s democracy and security.
On Friday last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) intentionally ignored the public will, and did not follow legislative procedures. They are acting like hooligans, intent on forcing fake reforms through the legislature. In essence, they are Chinese agents. This kind of situation keeps occurring. They are waiting for the right opportunity to set fires everywhere when the public is not watching. While we are busy, forced to put out one fire, they make their move and set another attack on democracy.
Whether the Democratic Progressive Party can adeptly use executive powers to fight off the KMT and TPP’s power grabs in the legislature remains to be seen. However, it is certain that the KMT and TPP have already made it clear that it is doing China’s bidding behind the scenes, trying to drag down Taiwan’s economy, paralyze the legislature and cause the public to lose trust in the government.
These two parties’ shenanigans are one of the factors for Taiwanese indifference toward politics.
If we want to resolve this predicament, we might all need to continuously call for Taiwanese to take to the streets to effect change.
If the time comes, are you willing to protect our democracy together?
Yeh Hsin-yi
Tainan
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS