Legislator’s document leak<\b>
There was a government document leak incident several years ago when I was working at a civil institution. There was a coworker on our team who was extremely diligent and circumspect about their duties.
One day when they were in the office, they suddenly had an emergency come up and inadvertently left a document with critical information where anyone could see.
The district prosecutors’ office later indicted my coworker, charging them with leaking national security secrets.
Fortunately, the judge on the case understood that this supposed criminal act was undoubtedly related to needing to rush off to an emergency, and was not an intentional act. The judge ultimately handed my coworker a lenient sentence.
In stark contrast, we have Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) publicly divulging contents from secret documents related to Ukraine. Hsu came straight out and intentionally revealed the payment methods and channels listed in the documents.
Not only did she damage the mutual trust between Taiwan and the Czech Republic, but she also unnecessarily made things more difficult for Taiwan’s assistance to Ukraine, even to the point of greatly lowering our national credibility in the eyes of other countries.
She is evidently a suspect in divulging secrets and intelligence. As a legislator, Hsu’s salary comes from the public purse. At the very least, she ought to be protecting classified documents.
If political power is used to intervene in judicial processes and she gets off scot-free, then what message does this send to civil servants on the bottom rungs who end up prosecuted for bona fide accidents? What an utter shame.
Yeh Yu-cheng,
Pingtung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of