Legislator’s document leak<\b>
There was a government document leak incident several years ago when I was working at a civil institution. There was a coworker on our team who was extremely diligent and circumspect about their duties.
One day when they were in the office, they suddenly had an emergency come up and inadvertently left a document with critical information where anyone could see.
The district prosecutors’ office later indicted my coworker, charging them with leaking national security secrets.
Fortunately, the judge on the case understood that this supposed criminal act was undoubtedly related to needing to rush off to an emergency, and was not an intentional act. The judge ultimately handed my coworker a lenient sentence.
In stark contrast, we have Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) publicly divulging contents from secret documents related to Ukraine. Hsu came straight out and intentionally revealed the payment methods and channels listed in the documents.
Not only did she damage the mutual trust between Taiwan and the Czech Republic, but she also unnecessarily made things more difficult for Taiwan’s assistance to Ukraine, even to the point of greatly lowering our national credibility in the eyes of other countries.
She is evidently a suspect in divulging secrets and intelligence. As a legislator, Hsu’s salary comes from the public purse. At the very least, she ought to be protecting classified documents.
If political power is used to intervene in judicial processes and she gets off scot-free, then what message does this send to civil servants on the bottom rungs who end up prosecuted for bona fide accidents? What an utter shame.
Yeh Yu-cheng,
Pingtung
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS