As Taiwan grapples with the complexities of modern governance and societal challenges, one crucial aspect demanding attention is the active involvement of our youth in shaping the nation’s future. Engaging young people in civic affairs is not just a matter of democratic principle — it is a strategic imperative for building a more inclusive and sustainable society.
The significance of engaging young people lies in recognizing that young voices are essential for a vibrant and dynamic democracy. Empowering our youth to participate in political processes, community initiatives and public discourse is not merely a gesture of goodwill, but an investment in the long-term resilience and vitality of our nation.
To cultivate a culture of active citizenship among our youth, we must first recognize the inherent value of their perspectives and experiences. Young people bring fresh ideas, innovative solutions, and a deep sense of social justice to the table. Recent years have underscored the transformative potential of youth-led movements around the world.
By providing them with platforms to express their views and contribute to decisionmaking processes, we not only enrich our public discourse, but also nurture a sense of responsibility toward the common good within them.
Initiatives such as youth advisory councils and town hall meetings specifically for young people can help bridge the gap between generations and empower young people to become active participants in shaping their communities.
However, fostering youth civic engagement goes beyond mere participation — it is about creating an environment where young voices feel valued, heard, respected and supported. This imperative underscores the need for significant investment in educational programs aimed at promoting civic literacy, critical thinking and ethical leadership among youth. Schools play a vital role here, providing civics education that encourages students to critically analyze political issues, engage in respectful dialogue with peers, and understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.
Moreover, building bridges between schools, communities and government institutions is crucial for facilitating meaningful youth participation in policymaking and governance. For example, local governments can take proactive measures by establishing youth councils or advisory boards to provide input on issues directly affecting young people.
In addition to formal mechanisms, creating informal spaces for youth to engage with civic life is essential. Community-based organizations and youth clubs can provide valuable opportunities for young people to develop leadership skills.
Furthermore, addressing the barriers that might prevent young people from participating fully in civic life is crucial. This includes addressing inequalities such as unequal access to education and economic opportunities, as well as removing bureaucratic obstacles that might hinder youth participation in decisionmaking processes.
In essence, encouraging youth engagement is not just about doing what is right — it is vital for our democracy’s strength.
By empowering our youth to become active agents of change, we can harness their energy and creativity to address pressing societal challenges. Let us listen to the young voices and work together to build a future that reflects the aspirations of all Taiwanese.
Hsu Hsin-fang is a student from the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS