As Taiwan grapples with the complexities of modern governance and societal challenges, one crucial aspect demanding attention is the active involvement of our youth in shaping the nation’s future. Engaging young people in civic affairs is not just a matter of democratic principle — it is a strategic imperative for building a more inclusive and sustainable society.
The significance of engaging young people lies in recognizing that young voices are essential for a vibrant and dynamic democracy. Empowering our youth to participate in political processes, community initiatives and public discourse is not merely a gesture of goodwill, but an investment in the long-term resilience and vitality of our nation.
To cultivate a culture of active citizenship among our youth, we must first recognize the inherent value of their perspectives and experiences. Young people bring fresh ideas, innovative solutions, and a deep sense of social justice to the table. Recent years have underscored the transformative potential of youth-led movements around the world.
By providing them with platforms to express their views and contribute to decisionmaking processes, we not only enrich our public discourse, but also nurture a sense of responsibility toward the common good within them.
Initiatives such as youth advisory councils and town hall meetings specifically for young people can help bridge the gap between generations and empower young people to become active participants in shaping their communities.
However, fostering youth civic engagement goes beyond mere participation — it is about creating an environment where young voices feel valued, heard, respected and supported. This imperative underscores the need for significant investment in educational programs aimed at promoting civic literacy, critical thinking and ethical leadership among youth. Schools play a vital role here, providing civics education that encourages students to critically analyze political issues, engage in respectful dialogue with peers, and understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.
Moreover, building bridges between schools, communities and government institutions is crucial for facilitating meaningful youth participation in policymaking and governance. For example, local governments can take proactive measures by establishing youth councils or advisory boards to provide input on issues directly affecting young people.
In addition to formal mechanisms, creating informal spaces for youth to engage with civic life is essential. Community-based organizations and youth clubs can provide valuable opportunities for young people to develop leadership skills.
Furthermore, addressing the barriers that might prevent young people from participating fully in civic life is crucial. This includes addressing inequalities such as unequal access to education and economic opportunities, as well as removing bureaucratic obstacles that might hinder youth participation in decisionmaking processes.
In essence, encouraging youth engagement is not just about doing what is right — it is vital for our democracy’s strength.
By empowering our youth to become active agents of change, we can harness their energy and creativity to address pressing societal challenges. Let us listen to the young voices and work together to build a future that reflects the aspirations of all Taiwanese.
Hsu Hsin-fang is a student from the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS