As Taiwan grapples with the complexities of modern governance and societal challenges, one crucial aspect demanding attention is the active involvement of our youth in shaping the nation’s future. Engaging young people in civic affairs is not just a matter of democratic principle — it is a strategic imperative for building a more inclusive and sustainable society.
The significance of engaging young people lies in recognizing that young voices are essential for a vibrant and dynamic democracy. Empowering our youth to participate in political processes, community initiatives and public discourse is not merely a gesture of goodwill, but an investment in the long-term resilience and vitality of our nation.
To cultivate a culture of active citizenship among our youth, we must first recognize the inherent value of their perspectives and experiences. Young people bring fresh ideas, innovative solutions, and a deep sense of social justice to the table. Recent years have underscored the transformative potential of youth-led movements around the world.
By providing them with platforms to express their views and contribute to decisionmaking processes, we not only enrich our public discourse, but also nurture a sense of responsibility toward the common good within them.
Initiatives such as youth advisory councils and town hall meetings specifically for young people can help bridge the gap between generations and empower young people to become active participants in shaping their communities.
However, fostering youth civic engagement goes beyond mere participation — it is about creating an environment where young voices feel valued, heard, respected and supported. This imperative underscores the need for significant investment in educational programs aimed at promoting civic literacy, critical thinking and ethical leadership among youth. Schools play a vital role here, providing civics education that encourages students to critically analyze political issues, engage in respectful dialogue with peers, and understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.
Moreover, building bridges between schools, communities and government institutions is crucial for facilitating meaningful youth participation in policymaking and governance. For example, local governments can take proactive measures by establishing youth councils or advisory boards to provide input on issues directly affecting young people.
In addition to formal mechanisms, creating informal spaces for youth to engage with civic life is essential. Community-based organizations and youth clubs can provide valuable opportunities for young people to develop leadership skills.
Furthermore, addressing the barriers that might prevent young people from participating fully in civic life is crucial. This includes addressing inequalities such as unequal access to education and economic opportunities, as well as removing bureaucratic obstacles that might hinder youth participation in decisionmaking processes.
In essence, encouraging youth engagement is not just about doing what is right — it is vital for our democracy’s strength.
By empowering our youth to become active agents of change, we can harness their energy and creativity to address pressing societal challenges. Let us listen to the young voices and work together to build a future that reflects the aspirations of all Taiwanese.
Hsu Hsin-fang is a student from the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS