Perhaps mastery in some form of martial arts would be required for legislators in light of the inevitability of brawls in the next four years. Unfortunately, it seems like the force of a better argument alone cannot withstand the might of Muay Thai.
Twenty-first century Taiwanese politics sometimes resembles that of a primitive era. So much talk of legislative reform, yet so little has actually changed.
It has once again ended up in such physical altercations and chaos, because the hostile opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) insist on forcing through bills to greatly expand the power of the legislature, hoping to make the executive branch subordinate to the legislative branch.
What is especially concerning is criminalizing “contempt of the legislature,” which could easily be used to target government ministers. In rushing the bills to the floor, the lack of transparency and procedural accountability were painfully obvious. The Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee did not get to review the bills in detail.
Moreover, some revisions to the KMT-TPP bill were not accessible on the Legislative Yuan’s Web site prior to the vote, suggesting that debates on this matter were not welcomed in the first place.
The KMT complained about the tyranny of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) majority in the past eight years. Yet, it has conveniently forgotten all about this once it formed a majority with the TPP.
“We deeply regret that the DPP has not only restricted legislative powers, but also used its executive advantages to vilify and undermine the opposition’s efforts to promote transparency. The DPP has historically damaged Taiwan’s democracy and rule of law through secrecy and opaque processes,” the TPP said in a statement.
Clearly, the TPP is blinded by their hatred of the DPP to the point of following the KMT unconditionally into this predicament. TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) needs to reflect deeply — is this the “new politics” you promised to deliver to voters? Should procedural fairness be sacrificed for political expediency?
Thousands of protesters gathered outside the Legislative Yuan to demand the proceedings be declared null and void, reminiscent of the Sunflower movement.
The protesters have much to be angry about — not only are the reforms ill-conceived and malicious, but also the facetious manner in which KMT legislators have been handling this situation is infuriating.
During their occupation of the legislative chamber, KMT legislators were taking selfies while attention-craving KMT Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) played a recorder, making a mockery of the situation.
At this point, political theater clearly has replaced quality deliberation, to the detriment of Taiwan’s democracy.
Rather than irresponsibly expanding the power of the legislature, changing our legislative culture into one that fosters deliberation and cooperation is even more crucial for elevating the status of the Legislative Yuan.
Though some politicians enjoy the spotlight of conflict, meaningful and lasting changes can only be achieved if backed by reason, not brute force.
Linus Chiou is a graduate student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS