Perhaps mastery in some form of martial arts would be required for legislators in light of the inevitability of brawls in the next four years. Unfortunately, it seems like the force of a better argument alone cannot withstand the might of Muay Thai.
Twenty-first century Taiwanese politics sometimes resembles that of a primitive era. So much talk of legislative reform, yet so little has actually changed.
It has once again ended up in such physical altercations and chaos, because the hostile opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) insist on forcing through bills to greatly expand the power of the legislature, hoping to make the executive branch subordinate to the legislative branch.
What is especially concerning is criminalizing “contempt of the legislature,” which could easily be used to target government ministers. In rushing the bills to the floor, the lack of transparency and procedural accountability were painfully obvious. The Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee did not get to review the bills in detail.
Moreover, some revisions to the KMT-TPP bill were not accessible on the Legislative Yuan’s Web site prior to the vote, suggesting that debates on this matter were not welcomed in the first place.
The KMT complained about the tyranny of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) majority in the past eight years. Yet, it has conveniently forgotten all about this once it formed a majority with the TPP.
“We deeply regret that the DPP has not only restricted legislative powers, but also used its executive advantages to vilify and undermine the opposition’s efforts to promote transparency. The DPP has historically damaged Taiwan’s democracy and rule of law through secrecy and opaque processes,” the TPP said in a statement.
Clearly, the TPP is blinded by their hatred of the DPP to the point of following the KMT unconditionally into this predicament. TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) needs to reflect deeply — is this the “new politics” you promised to deliver to voters? Should procedural fairness be sacrificed for political expediency?
Thousands of protesters gathered outside the Legislative Yuan to demand the proceedings be declared null and void, reminiscent of the Sunflower movement.
The protesters have much to be angry about — not only are the reforms ill-conceived and malicious, but also the facetious manner in which KMT legislators have been handling this situation is infuriating.
During their occupation of the legislative chamber, KMT legislators were taking selfies while attention-craving KMT Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) played a recorder, making a mockery of the situation.
At this point, political theater clearly has replaced quality deliberation, to the detriment of Taiwan’s democracy.
Rather than irresponsibly expanding the power of the legislature, changing our legislative culture into one that fosters deliberation and cooperation is even more crucial for elevating the status of the Legislative Yuan.
Though some politicians enjoy the spotlight of conflict, meaningful and lasting changes can only be achieved if backed by reason, not brute force.
Linus Chiou is a graduate student at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
RSS