Out of the fog that claimed the life of Iran’s president, some clarity is emerging about Tehran’s next steps.
The bad news for Western capitals and those Iranian activists pushing for change is that there is little hope of a relaxation of political oppression, or of the antagonism directed at the US and its allies, according to Western officials.
They see the authoritarian regime as robust enough to carry on its current trajectory after former Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi’s death in a helicopter crash.
Illustration: Mountain People
Less clear is how Raisi’s passing changes the calculus for whoever will eventually succeed the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is in his mid-80s.
Those considerations, along with renewed questions over the health of Saudi Arabia’s elderly king, mean that the focus has turned to transition in each of the Middle East powers. That adds another layer of uncertainty, and potential instability, to months of regional turmoil triggered by the Israel-Hamas war.
“All of these developments are a great reminder that nobody controls the narrative, and the discussions about the state of Middle East risk and geopolitical risk more broadly are extremely fluid,” Tina Fordham, founder of Fordham Global Foresight, told Bloomberg Television on Monday.
Last year, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan famously described the Middle East as “quieter today” than at any time in the past two decades — the week before Hamas attacked Israel and set off the war in Gaza.
As well as that conflict, and heightened tensions between Israel and Iran, is the fact that 88-year-old Saudi Arabian King Salman is being treated for lung inflammation. That caused his son to scrap his own travel plans and is another complicating factor in Washington’s push for a US defense agreement with Riyadh. That plan, which Iran opposes, would see the kingdom also normalize ties with Israel.
“Could the passing of the king interrupt that flow or perhaps reduce the risk appetite for considering something like that?” Fordham asked. “I am inclined to say no, but it does put a spanner in the works for the diplomacy under way.”
Sullivan was in Riyadh on Saturday for talks with Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman that focused on “a comprehensive vision for an integrated Middle East region,” a US Department of State readout said. He then traveled to Israel, where he reminded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of the need for “a political strategy” that can be allied to his military campaign for a post-war Gaza.
That same day, the Iranian authorities lost contact with the president’s helicopter, which went down in the country’s northwest, also killing Hossein Amirabdollahian, the nation’s minister of foreign affairs.
While Iran’s supreme leader remains in charge, Raisi’s sudden death comes at a difficult time for Israel as it faces the continued threat of escalation surrounding the war in Gaza, said Joshua Krasna, a former Israeli diplomat and intelligence analyst.
“Being able to manage the crisis we have now was helped by knowing exactly who we’re dealing with,” Krasna said. “The moment things become less clear, that can be a problem.”
For Tehran, the deaths are unlikely to derail its detente with Saudi Arabia that was brokered by China last year, said Hasnain Malik, a Dubai-based strategist at Tellimer.
Nor is Iranian support for regional proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Yemen-based Houthi group likely to waver, Malik said.
What it does do is remove one potential candidate for succession to the supreme leader and might increase the probability that Khamenei’s son Mojtaba Khamenei might follow him.
Ali “Khamenei is at a challenging crossroads,” said David Menashri, a professor emeritus of Iranian studies at Tel Aviv University who founded its Center for Iranian Studies.
“Raisi was the first president who served under him with whom he got along well, he was the first who didn’t tangle publicly with him,” and played a key role in faithfully enacting his policy of moving Iran toward China and Russia, Menashri said.
Ali Khamenei now has to find a candidate who will be equally aligned and willing to stay in the shadows.
The Iranian government, traditionally prone to conspiracy theories, has been clear in its messaging that the crash was due to bad weather and it has not blamed external actors for the incident.
That is a sign that Iran is giving priority to internal stability and an orderly succession rather than stoking the flames of regional tensions, according to a senior foreign diplomat who tracks Iran.
Iran’s foreign minister was a capable diplomat who subscribed to the idea of Iran as an assertive regional power. He had close ties to the late Qasem Soleimani, who was killed in a US drone strike in 2020, and will be difficult to replace, the person said, adding that there no signs the internal political debate will be opened to reformers.
That tracks with the US thinking, where two people familiar with the matter said that Amirabdollahian was active with proxies in Iraq.
The US assessment for now is also that the crash was not an act of sabotage, the people said.
In Saudi Arabia, the king’s son has already been handed the main levers of power and MBS, as he is commonly known, has run the day-to-day business of the kingdom as crown prince since 2017.
The kingdom’s oil strategy has been dominated for much of the past decade by MBS and publicly articulated in recent years by his half-brother, Saudi Arabian Minister of Energy Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman.
For decades, the kingdom has prized continuity and stability in its oil personnel and the policies they adopt. That suggests its strategy — predicated on an alliance with Russia and other exporters known as OPEC+, which is curbing supplies to prop up crude prices — would likely continue unaffected.
OPEC’s No. 1 and No. 3 powers in terms of output respectively, Saudi Arabia and Iran are expected to press ahead toward establishing warmer diplomatic relations, as both see the value of maintaining that path, said Hasan Alhasan, senior fellow for Middle East policy at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
“They’ve also shielded these relations from broader regional dynamics so the Saudi-Iranian relationship seems to be standing on its own feet at the moment,” Alhasan said.
That is a development being closely watched by Russia, which has forged deeper ties with both countries since its invasion of Ukraine.
“The best option for Russia is to see relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia improving further, but there are fears that Israel will interfere with this,” said Elena Suponina, a Middle East analyst based in Moscow.
A delicate transition period lies ahead for MBS and questions remain over his own successor, but the 38-year-old’s installation might put an end to some political maneuvering for now, Alhasan said.
“An MBS that’s king is going to be more confident and in greater control and therefore feel less of a need to take strong measures against internal dissent,” he said.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS