In the complex geopolitical landscape of the 21st century, the art of statecraft has evolved beyond traditional diplomacy and military engagements. One of the most nuanced forms of this evolution is the concept of “united front” tactics — a strategy that China has been increasingly employing in its interactions with India.
At its core, “united front” tactics involve the mobilization of several groups to serve a singular strategic interest. For China, that translates into a multifaceted approach toward India, aiming to influence its political decisions, economic policies and public opinion to align with Chinese interests.
One of the most covert aspects of China’s “united front” tactics is cyberwarfare. Reports of cyberattacks on India’s critical infrastructure, such as its power grid, have raised alarms about a silent invasion that could cripple a nation without a single soldier crossing its borders. The digital strikes are not just about immediate disruption; they are a psychological tool, instilling a sense of vulnerability within the Indian state.
China’s strategy extends to influence operations that target the very fabric of Indian society. By cultivating relationships with influential individuals, think tanks and cultural organizations, China seeks to create a narrative conducive to its worldview.
For example, its Confucius Institutes have been at the center of controversy, with allegations of them being a front for espionage and propaganda.
The battleground has shifted from physical territories to the cognitive realm. Disinformation campaigns and the manipulation of media narratives are part of China’s arsenal to destabilize and confuse. The aim is to create a parallel reality where facts are malleable and truth is what the Chinese Communist Party deems it to be.
China’s “united front” work also includes soft power initiatives. Cultural exchange programs and outreach to the Indian diaspora are designed to foster a positive image of China, countering the negative press it often receives. The efforts are subtle, yet powerful, as they shape perceptions over the long term.
The Doklam standoff and the clashes in the Galwan Valley are stark reminders of the military dimension of China’s “united front” tactics. The confrontations serve a dual purpose: demonstrating China’s military might and testing India’s resolve. They are a physical manifestation of the psychological and political pressure exerted through other “united front” activities.
India stands at a crossroads, facing a neighbor that wields “united front” tactics with strategic finesse. The challenge for India is to recognize these maneuvers and counter them with a “united front” of its own — a coalition of democratic nations, robust cybersecurity measures and a resilient civil society that can withstand the allure and assault of China’s strategic chessboard.
As we navigate this era of new-age warfare, it is imperative for India and like-minded nations to develop a comprehensive understanding of “united front” tactics and devise counterstrategies that uphold their sovereignty and democratic values.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS