In the complex geopolitical landscape of the 21st century, the art of statecraft has evolved beyond traditional diplomacy and military engagements. One of the most nuanced forms of this evolution is the concept of “united front” tactics — a strategy that China has been increasingly employing in its interactions with India.
At its core, “united front” tactics involve the mobilization of several groups to serve a singular strategic interest. For China, that translates into a multifaceted approach toward India, aiming to influence its political decisions, economic policies and public opinion to align with Chinese interests.
One of the most covert aspects of China’s “united front” tactics is cyberwarfare. Reports of cyberattacks on India’s critical infrastructure, such as its power grid, have raised alarms about a silent invasion that could cripple a nation without a single soldier crossing its borders. The digital strikes are not just about immediate disruption; they are a psychological tool, instilling a sense of vulnerability within the Indian state.
China’s strategy extends to influence operations that target the very fabric of Indian society. By cultivating relationships with influential individuals, think tanks and cultural organizations, China seeks to create a narrative conducive to its worldview.
For example, its Confucius Institutes have been at the center of controversy, with allegations of them being a front for espionage and propaganda.
The battleground has shifted from physical territories to the cognitive realm. Disinformation campaigns and the manipulation of media narratives are part of China’s arsenal to destabilize and confuse. The aim is to create a parallel reality where facts are malleable and truth is what the Chinese Communist Party deems it to be.
China’s “united front” work also includes soft power initiatives. Cultural exchange programs and outreach to the Indian diaspora are designed to foster a positive image of China, countering the negative press it often receives. The efforts are subtle, yet powerful, as they shape perceptions over the long term.
The Doklam standoff and the clashes in the Galwan Valley are stark reminders of the military dimension of China’s “united front” tactics. The confrontations serve a dual purpose: demonstrating China’s military might and testing India’s resolve. They are a physical manifestation of the psychological and political pressure exerted through other “united front” activities.
India stands at a crossroads, facing a neighbor that wields “united front” tactics with strategic finesse. The challenge for India is to recognize these maneuvers and counter them with a “united front” of its own — a coalition of democratic nations, robust cybersecurity measures and a resilient civil society that can withstand the allure and assault of China’s strategic chessboard.
As we navigate this era of new-age warfare, it is imperative for India and like-minded nations to develop a comprehensive understanding of “united front” tactics and devise counterstrategies that uphold their sovereignty and democratic values.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS