The Ministry of Health and Welfare recently unveiled a draft amendment to the Assisted Reproduction Act (人工生殖法), which also incorporates the application of the act to three special groups of same-sex couples, single women and surrogate mothers — among which child surrogacy must be carried out on a “nocompensation” basis.
However, applicants must provide the necessary fees, and must not make surrogate mothers sign a contract by fraud or threat. Contraventions could face imprisonment of not more than three years.
While surrogate motherhood is becoming increasingly accepted, it is the government’s responsibility to build a diverse and harmonious society to ensure that all children can grow up safely and securely in whichever family they have.
In 2005, when the army’s 586th Brigade was transiting to garrison duty, the brigade’s company commander, surnamed Sun (孫), was killed in a traffic incident. His girlfriend, surnamed Lee (李), who had been in a relationship with him for about eight years, appealed to then-premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and then-minister of national defense Lee Jye (李傑) for her to be able to obtain Sun’s sperm so that she could have his child.
Within the crucial 72 hours after the incident, Hsieh instructed the health authorities to assist Lee in obtaining Sun’s sperm through a special permit, and she fulfilled her wish.
However, what followed were issues involving the unforeseen pregnancy, the mother’s mental health and the child’s personal rights. Ethical issues and legal rights made the case more complex. As the cameras and spotlight faded away, hardly anyone remembers the case today.
While the protection of the rights of those involved in assisted reproduction should not be prioritized over the well-being and rights of the child and the family, the physical and mental health of the mother and the protection of her rights are also of paramount importance.
SURROGACY CONTRACT
A comprehensive surrogacy contract should be implemented that is based on a safe environment that considers “human dignity.” The national mechanisms should protect the safety of those involved, so their rights would not be harmed. Only with the complementary measures that account for legal considerations can we ensure the “stable and orderly” development of such cooperative relationships.
Wei Zheng (魏徵), a politician and historian in the Tang (唐) Dynasty, once advised Emperor Taizong (太宗): “Your Majesty, as a parent who cares for the people, should worry about the people’s worries and take the people’s heart as his own, because this is the normal and proper practice.”
OTHER CASES
In addition to the issue of reproductive rights, the environment for raising children is also important. While people are glad to see the health ministry’s efforts to push for the draft amendment, it must be emphasized that only when all children are allowed to grow up in a stable and safe environment can the positive legislation on assisted reproduction be more complete.
In Denmark, parents of babies are legally entitled to 13 weeks of parental leave, and since May 1, parents of twins have been given an additional 13 weeks of leave per year to ensure more time for proper parenting. This would likely make the policy more complete.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS