Since 2014, China has forcibly repatriated 12,000 of its citizens from more than 120 countries and regions around the world. Behind every one of these rather large numbers lies a real story of life and fear. Evidently, the long arm of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) special agents who hunt dissidents overseas can reach into the privacy of any dissident and try to control their destinies. This is not a movie script — it is a world tour of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) anti-corruption show.
On Monday last week, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) program Four Corners broadcast an investigation in which it interviewed a man, going by the alias Eric, who fled from China to Australia last year. “Eric” is a former secret police officer who from 2008 to early last year worked for the Political Security Protection Bureau, a section of the Chinese Ministry of Public Security. Having found a safe haven in Australia, “Eric” has now revealed his involvement in state terror activities in which he took on various identities ranging from a real-estate executive to a freedom fighter, all for the purpose of luring dissidents into traps set by the CCP.
The story of this former CCP agent might sound like a Hollywood script, but it is a true tale of global manhunts and suppression of freedom of speech.
The CCP is so keen to hunt down dissidents that it has invested heavily in infiltrating other countries’ political and economic systems. For example, in order to extradite Edwin Yin (尹科), a Chinese YouTuber who now lives in Australia, the authorities of Yin’s native Zhejiang Province have spared no expense to infiltrate Australia, because Yin’s scathing political commentaries have become a thorn in its side.
The CCP seems to regard “anti-corruption” as an excuse for hunting dissidents all over the world. Xi’s “anti-corruption” campaign is in fact a political tool to suppress any criticism of himself. From domestic corruption scandals in China to the pursuit of dissidents overseas, the CCP is playing and enjoying a one-man show.
Yin is just one among countless others who have been forced to endure extrajudicial sanctions imposed by the long arm of the CCP. This is not just persecution of individuals, but a blatant disregard of the basic freedoms of all human beings. Such activities expose the CCP’s attempts to manipulate and infiltrate countries all over the world.
In its pursuit of dissidents, the CCP is posing as the world’s police officer and trying to convince the world of its definition of “justice.” However, it is all for the sake of domestic political manipulation and power. Xi’s global anti-corruption campaign is nothing more than a carefully orchestrated smokescreen that he hopes can conceal China’s domestic problems.
Chang Yi-ying is self-employed.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS