Since 2014, China has forcibly repatriated 12,000 of its citizens from more than 120 countries and regions around the world. Behind every one of these rather large numbers lies a real story of life and fear. Evidently, the long arm of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) special agents who hunt dissidents overseas can reach into the privacy of any dissident and try to control their destinies. This is not a movie script — it is a world tour of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) anti-corruption show.
On Monday last week, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) program Four Corners broadcast an investigation in which it interviewed a man, going by the alias Eric, who fled from China to Australia last year. “Eric” is a former secret police officer who from 2008 to early last year worked for the Political Security Protection Bureau, a section of the Chinese Ministry of Public Security. Having found a safe haven in Australia, “Eric” has now revealed his involvement in state terror activities in which he took on various identities ranging from a real-estate executive to a freedom fighter, all for the purpose of luring dissidents into traps set by the CCP.
The story of this former CCP agent might sound like a Hollywood script, but it is a true tale of global manhunts and suppression of freedom of speech.
The CCP is so keen to hunt down dissidents that it has invested heavily in infiltrating other countries’ political and economic systems. For example, in order to extradite Edwin Yin (尹科), a Chinese YouTuber who now lives in Australia, the authorities of Yin’s native Zhejiang Province have spared no expense to infiltrate Australia, because Yin’s scathing political commentaries have become a thorn in its side.
The CCP seems to regard “anti-corruption” as an excuse for hunting dissidents all over the world. Xi’s “anti-corruption” campaign is in fact a political tool to suppress any criticism of himself. From domestic corruption scandals in China to the pursuit of dissidents overseas, the CCP is playing and enjoying a one-man show.
Yin is just one among countless others who have been forced to endure extrajudicial sanctions imposed by the long arm of the CCP. This is not just persecution of individuals, but a blatant disregard of the basic freedoms of all human beings. Such activities expose the CCP’s attempts to manipulate and infiltrate countries all over the world.
In its pursuit of dissidents, the CCP is posing as the world’s police officer and trying to convince the world of its definition of “justice.” However, it is all for the sake of domestic political manipulation and power. Xi’s global anti-corruption campaign is nothing more than a carefully orchestrated smokescreen that he hopes can conceal China’s domestic problems.
Chang Yi-ying is self-employed.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS