President William Lai (賴清德) and Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) were officially sworn into office yesterday morning, becoming the fifth democratically elected leaders of Taiwan and launching the nation’s 16th presidential term. It was a momentous occasion, as it is the first time a party is to govern for a third consecutive term since direct presidential elections began in 1996. It is also the first time in 16 years that no party has a majority in the Legislative Yuan.
Much has been made in the lead-up to the inauguration about Lai’s reputation as a “pragmatic worker for Taiwanese independence” and Beijing’s “troublemaker” moniker. The legislature also put its divisions on dramatic display on Friday last week, as news channels worldwide showed footage of brawls, lawmakers falling on their heads and another absconding with documents.
It was within this context that Lai took to the podium outside the Presidential Office and prepared to set the tone for his four years in office. His speech sought to directly address these concerns by emphasizing cross-strait peace and cooperation among political parties.
The first item in Lai’s speech was an appeal to opposition parties to work with ruling party lawmakers and the executive branch. He emphasized that the political structure is the choice of Taiwanese, who “have high expectations for rational governance.” Coming only days after chaos erupted in the legislature over controversial reform bills, Lai’s comments read as pointed and urgent. Whether they will fall on deaf ears remains to be seen.
The other matters under intense scrutiny are cross-strait issues. In his address, Lai leaned heavily into expectations for peace, using the word 23 times.
“As with other nations, Taiwan walked a difficult path for post-war revitalization before getting to where we are today. No one wants these achievements to be destroyed by war,” he said.
The emphasis is a response to critics who fear Lai would be a destabilizing presence in office. Compared with his predecessors, Lai’s reputation frees him from needing to take a tough stance against China. Instead, he can extend goodwill without concern that the “pragmatic worker for Taiwanese independence” is reneging on his principles. He called on Beijing to “choose dialogue over confrontation,” and that the two governments could start by resuming cross-strait tourism and enrollment of Chinese students at Taiwanese institutions. Giving a concrete suggestion is a calculated step toward striking a conciliatory tone with Beijing, but it would likely be too tepid to appease his critics until real policies are deployed.
Lai reiterated calls for Beijing to “face the reality of the Republic of China’s existence” and cease its intimidation. He also reiterated his “Four Pillars of Peace” proposed last year to strengthen national defense, improve economic security, provide stable and principled leadership, and engage in values-based diplomacy. Taken as a whole, his comments on cross-strait affairs show that Lai would lean a little harder into reconciliation than former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), while continuing her rhetoric. A seasoned politician, Lai knows he needs to downplay his reputation to ease concerns at home and abroad.
On domestic issues, Lai highlighted Taiwan’s dominance in semiconductors and his administration’s goal of incorporating artificial intelligence into all facets of society. He also touched on vowed to tackle issues ranging from housing to low salaries and transportation safety through a “National Project of Hope.” A framework we can expect to hear more about over his term.
His presidency has only just started, and Lai is already facing a fractured legislature and intense international scrutiny. From his inaugural address, it seems Taiwan can look forward to a measured presence in the Presidential Office.
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS