When Microsoft Corp pledged four years ago to remove more carbon than it emits by the end of the decade, it was one of the most ambitious and comprehensive plans to tackle climate change. Now the software giant’s relentless push to be the global leader in artificial intelligence (AI) is putting that goal in peril.
The Seattle-based company’s total planet-warming impact is about 30 percent higher today than it was in 2020, according to the latest sustainability report published on Wednesday.
That makes getting to below zero by 2030 even harder than it was when it announced its carbon-negative goal.
To meet its goals, the software giant has to make serious progress very quickly in gaining access to green steel and concrete, and less carbon-intensive chips, Microsoft president Brad Smith said in an exclusive interview with Bloomberg Green.
“In 2020, we unveiled what we called our carbon moonshot. That was before the explosion in artificial intelligence,” he said. “So in many ways the moon is five times as far away as it was in 2020, if you just think of our own forecast for the expansion of AI and its electrical needs.”
Microsoft’s predicament is one of the first concrete examples of how the pursuit of AI is colliding with efforts to cut emissions. Choosing to capitalize on its early lead in the new market for generative AI has made Microsoft the most valuable company in the world, but its leaders also acknowledge keeping up with demand would mean investing more heavily in polluting assets.
AI products are power hungry and data-processing heavy. That first increases the workload of existing centers, which increases energy use.
However, such is the demand that, to keep up, Microsoft has to also build new data centers. That requires carbon-intensive cement, steel and microchips.
The tech giant planned to spend more than US$50 billion between July last year and next month on expanding its data centers to meet rising demand for AI products.
That number for the next 12 months, starting in July, is expected to be even higher, Microsoft chief financial officer Amy Hood said in an interview last month.
Since February, the company has touted new data center projects in Wisconsin, Thailand, Indonesia, Spain, Germany and Japan.
Smith said he believes the good AI can do for the world would outweigh its environmental impact.
“We fundamentally believe that the answer is not to slow down the expansion of AI but to speed up the work needed to make it more environmentally friendly,” Smith said. “I guarantee there’s one way to fail: It’s to give up.”
Some Microsoft employees are speaking out about the company’s other AI-related work to enhance oil extraction. More than 10,000 employees have formed a group that wants Microsoft to reduce its global warming impact and some have quit in protest.
“Work to maximize oil production with our technology is negating all of our good work, extending the age of fossil fuels, and enabling untold emissions,” two former employees wrote. “We are both deeply saddened to be so let down by a company we loved so much.”
“Employees around the world are core to our sustainability mission,” a spokesperson for Microsoft said in response. “Our focus is empowering the energy transition.”
Microsoft is not alone. Its competitors in the AI race are Alphabet Inc’s Google, Meta Platforms Inc and Amazon.com Inc — companies that all set ambitious climate goals but have seen their total emissions increase.
In response to questions, a Google spokesperson said that predicting the increase in energy use, and emissions tied to AI is hard and the company is trying reduce its environmental impact by increasing deployment of clean energy and buying credits for carbon removal.
An Amazon spokesperson said “we remain committed” to reaching net zero by 2040 and touted the company’s work on enabling new clean energy sources, including nuclear.
Meta did not respond.
Despite AI’s ravenous energy consumption, this actually contributes little to Microsoft’s hike in emissions — at least on paper. That is because the company in its sustainability report said that it is 100 percent powered by renewables.
Companies use a range of mechanisms to make such claims, which vary widely in terms of credibility. Some firms enter into long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) with renewable developers, where they shoulder some of a new energy plant’s risk and help get new solar and wind farms online. In other cases, companies buy renewable energy credits (RECs) to claim they are using green power, but these inexpensive credits do little to spur new demand for green energy, researchers have consistently found.
Microsoft uses a mix of both approaches. On one hand, it is one of the biggest corporate participants in PPAs, according to BloombergNEF, which tracks these deals.
However, it is also a huge purchaser of RECs, using these instruments to claim about half of its energy use is clean, according to its environmental filings in 2022.
By using a large quantity of RECs, Microsoft is essentially masking an even larger growth in emissions.
“It is Microsoft’s plan to phase out the use of unbundled RECs in future years,” a spokesperson for the company said. “We are focused on PPAs as a primary strategy.”
Smith and Microsoft’s chief sustainability officer Melanie Nakagawa have laid out clear steps in the sustainability report on what else could be done. One of these steps is to increase efficiency, which is to use the same amount of energy or computing to do more work. That could help reduce the need for data centers, which would reduce emissions and electricity use.
On most things, “our climate goals require that we spend money,” Smith said. “But efficiency gains will actually enable us to save money.”
Microsoft has also been at the forefront of buying sustainable aviation fuels which has helped reduce some of its emissions from business travel. The company also wants to partner with those who would “accelerate breakthroughs” to make greener steel, concrete and fuels. Those technologies are starting to work at a small scale, but remain far from being available in commercial quantities even if expensive.
Cheap renewable power has helped make Microsoft’s climate journey easier. However, the tech giant’s electricity consumption last year rivaled that of a small European country, beating Slovenia easily. One of the biggest bottlenecks for it to keep getting access to green power is the lack of transmission lines from where the power is generated to the data centers, Smith said.
That is why Microsoft said it is going to increase lobbying efforts to get governments to speed up building the grid.
Despite all these efforts, what if Microsoft’s emissions remain high in 2029?
Smith said that bulk purchases of carbon removal credits “is always a possibility, but I don’t think it’s the desired course.”
There are myriad ways to remove carbon dioxide from the air — from devices with large fans and industrial chemicals to planting trees. However, these credits carry a premium price, many times more than US$100 per tonne that Microsoft applies as an internal carbon tax on its business travel.
“You’ve got to be willing to invest and pay for it,” Smith said, adding that climate change is “a problem that humanity created and that humanity can solve.”
Akshat Rathi is a senior reporter for Quartz and a nonresident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Center. Previously, he was The Conversation’s science editor and has worked at The Economist and the Royal Society of Chemistry. Dina Bass has covered technology for Bloomberg News for 22 years and serves as Bloomberg’s Seattle bureau chief.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS