Healthcare providers have been calling on the government to guarantee that the value of each National Health Insurance (NHI) point is at least NT$1 to save the nation’s healthcare system, so lawmakers have proposed bills to ensure one point is worth at least NT$0.95 or NT$1. However, this would increase the NHI budget by between NT$70.5 billion and NT$115.5 billion (US$2.19 billion and US$3.59 billion) per year, which could harm its global budget payment system.
There seems to be a consensus that the guaranteed NHI point value must be increased. However, how it should be budgeted for and what supplementary measures are needed is still up for discussion.
The NHI’s payment system is an “expenditure cap” system with “floating” point values, used to precisely match the predetermined annual budget, as the total expenditure claimed by healthcare facilities for their medical services is reimbursed based on an adjusted amount multiplied by the point value.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, medical services for COVID-19-related conditions were covered by a special relief fund, but as the disease was downgraded last year, payment for medical services reverted to the NHI system. However, the increase in service volume diluted point values to nearly NT$0.7.
Facing protests by healthcare providers, the Cabinet in November last year approved an additional budget of NT$5.13 billion to make up for deficits last year, supplementing the point value and raising it to NT$0.9, and promising that it would remain at least NT$0.9 this year.
However, eight healthcare providers’ associations earlier this month issued a joint statement, urging the government to change the NHI’s global budget payment system to a “expenditure target” system, meaning that when the point value is less than NT$1, the government should make up the deficit.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators proposed two amendments to the National Health Insurance Act (全民健康保險法), which would ensure that one NHI point would equal at least NT$0.95 or NT$1.
The bills were first reviewed in a legislature committee on May 2, but no consensus was reached. The first cross-party negotiation was held on Wednesday last week, in which the government was asked to propose solutions within a month.
However, with global inflation, soaring commodity and housing prices, a low birthrate and a shrinking working-age population, raising the NHI premium is an issue that the government tries to avoid. More funding adds an extra burden on taxpayers and crowds out funding for other essential services.
National Health Insurance Administration Director-General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良) on Wednesday last week said the agency is considering adjusting the supplementary NHI rates to be equal to the standard premium rate, but further discussions would be needed.
Some consumer groups have said that a fixed NHI point value would undermine the NHI’s global budget payment system, incentivizing hospitals to pursue service quantity over quality.
Some experts proposed reducing the NHI budget in areas such as new technology and drugs, and preventive screening tests, which they believe should be covered by specialized government budgets, while some pharmacists also called for prescription drugs to be removed from NHI coverage.
The government, healthcare providers and civic groups all agree that there is a pressing need for NHI reform, but whether a guaranteed NHI point value should be adopted, partially adopted or other measures should be introduced is a big decision for the new Cabinet.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
RSS