A delegation led by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) yesterday visited Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) in the South China Sea. They intended to challenge president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) position on Taiwan’s claim there, analysts have said.
The delegation of lawmakers from the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party intended to show support for Coast Guard Administration officials, inspect a new pier and reinforce Taiwan’s sovereignty, Central News Agency (CNA) quoted Ma as saying.
However, National Sun Yat-sen University professor emeritus Liao Dachi (廖達琪) told CNA last week that the visit was a challenge to Lai to reiterate Taiwan’s claims in the South China Sea.
The Republic of China historically claims all of the rocks, islands, reefs and features in the South China Sea and their surrounding waters that fall within the “nine-dash line.” Today, Taiwan controls Itu Aba, the uninhabited Zhongzhou Reef (中洲礁) and the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙島).
Despite its extensive claims, Taiwan generally refrains from asserting them over islands and features that are not under its control.
One reason that Lai might not want to assert Taiwan’s South China Sea claims at this time is that its relationship with the Philippines is warming after rocky ties when Rodrigo Duterte, who occasionally aligned with China, was Philippine president.
Ironically, China has not contested Taiwan’s presence on Itu Aba, with Beijing praising Taipei’s response to the 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which called Itu Aba “a rock,” and said it did not meet the definition of an island. Taiwan was prevented from contesting the ruling, but issued a statement saying that Itu Aba is an island as it has livestock, crops and fresh water — enough to support a human settlement.
Of course, China’s support was obviously motivated by a desire to reinforce its own claims by proxy through Taiwan. Arguably, China also has little motivation to contest Taiwan’s presence in the South China Sea, because it sees Taiwan as its own territory and, thus, Taipei’s claims are its own claims.
Likewise, Beijing is more likely to protest Japanese claims over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — which Tokyo administers as the Senkaku Islands — than it is to protest Taiwan’s claims there.
However, things are different when it comes to territorial disputes between only Taiwan and China. For example, China has on occasion prevented Taiwan from supplying coast guard officials stationed on the Pratas Islands, claiming it was conducting drills in nearby airspace and so had to close the area to outside air traffic.
Such “gray zone” tactics are intended to put pressure on the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, but they demonstrate the complexity of Taiwan-China territorial disputes.
If Lai were to reiterate Taiwan’s claims, it would appease a large portion of voters. It would also not likely upset Taiwan’s Southeast Asian neighbors, as they know that Taipei is unlikely to act on its claims. On the other hand, if Lai failed to reiterate claims, it would galvanize KMT voters.
Ultimately it is in Lai’s best interest to speak up on Taiwan’s South China Sea claims.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS