The recent European tour of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), conducted from May 5 to Friday last week, has garnered notable interest amid geopolitical changes and economic uncertainties. Xi’s visit to the continent, his first in five years, demonstrates the changing dynamics of China’s engagement with European countries, particularly in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and ongoing global tensions.
Xi’s travel plans notably omitted Italy, the sole European G7 nation that had previously signed up to the BRI, before formally withdrawing in December last year. This decision indicates a waning European enthusiasm toward China’s expansive economic project. Instead, Xi traveled to Hungary and Serbia, both of which are smaller European economies that heavily rely on Chinese investments. Hungary took the lead among EU members by becoming the first to join the initiative, with China becoming its top investor.
These selections reflect a nuanced approach from Beijing, aiming to strengthen its influence in smaller, strategically positioned nations amid increasing skepticism from larger EU powers. The exclusion of Italy from Xi’s itinerary is particularly significant, suggesting a re-evaluation of China’s approach toward Europe, possibly due to the mixed outcomes of its investments and partnership agreements in larger economies.
France played a crucial part in Xi’s European tour. The importance of this visit cannot be overstated, especially given French President Emmanuel Macron’s vocal advocacy of European “strategic autonomy.” Macron’s position, articulated in his address at Sorbonne University on April 25, positions Europe as a counterweight rather than subservient to US influence. This aligns well with China’s aspiration to promote a multipolar world, which would enhance its global influence.
The discussions between Xi and Macron likely centered on deepening economic relations and political collaboration, with both leaders eyeing mutual advantages.
With Macron midway through his final term as president, his eagerness to assert France — and by extension, Europe — as a significant global actor aligns neatly with China’s strategy to exploit European divisions for its geopolitical interests.
This summer’s Paris Olympics present a distinctive diplomatic platform for Macron, who intends to use the event as a stage to advocate for a global ceasefire — notably amid ongoing conflicts such as between Russia and Ukraine — which underscores his broader ambitions on the global stage. The symbolic weight of an Olympic ceasefire, combined with the presence of international leaders at the Games, could provide Macron with the leverage necessary to facilitate peace initiatives, or at least bring them to the forefront of global discourse.
China’s role in this context is crucial. As a significant player in international sports and a key influencer of global politics, China’s endorsement of, or participation in, such initiatives could determine whether they are successful. Additionally, the joint statement by Xi and Macron condemning violence in global conflict zones hints at a potential collaborative stance during the Olympics.
The visit also sheds light on broader strategic concerns within Europe. Europe finds itself in a delicate position as US-China competition intensifies, balancing its strategic autonomy with economic and security interests. Macron’s vision of Europe, which involves economic engagement with China and maintaining security ties with the US, captures this dilemma perfectly.
Nonetheless, there is still uncertainty surrounding the feasibility of this delicate balancing act. Europe’s internal divisions, economic dependencies and the geopolitical landscape make it challenging to pursue a cohesive strategy. The position of other European countries, especially Germany, would play a crucial role in determining Europe’s strategy toward China and the US.
Xi’s visit to Europe reflects broader changes in the global distribution of power. China’s strategic realignment in Europe involves prioritizing smaller, investment-hungry nations and maintaining crucial relations with key players such as France.
For Europe, and particularly for Macron, the visit and subsequent developments present an opportunity to redefine Europe’s role on the global stage, balancing between major powers while striving to carve out a space for strategic autonomy.
The unfolding events have deep implications for global politics. The strategies adopted by China and the responses from European nations would not only shape their bilateral relations, but also influence the broader international order in the years ahead.
Meng Chih-cheng is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at National Cheng Kung University.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS