Former US president Donald Trump’s verbal assaults on judges, prosecutors, witnesses, jurors and the broader US justice system are undermining the rule of law and democracy while fueling threats and potential violence against individuals involved with the legal cases against him and egging on his extremist allies, former federal prosecutors and judges say.
In his campaign to win the presidency again, and amid various criminal and civil trials, Trump has launched multiple attacks on the US legal system on his Truth Social platform to counter the 88 federal and state criminal charges he faces.
Trump, the all but certain Republican Party presidential nominee for this year’s election, has accelerated glorifying the insurgents who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. He has called them “patriots” and “hostages,” while promising that if he wins, he would free those convicted of crimes as one of his “first acts” in office.
Meanwhile, Trump has repeatedly cast doubt on the electoral system. He has refused to say he would accept the results of this year’s elections, a ploy similar to what he did in 2020 before falsely claiming the election was rigged — a claim he still maintains.
“If everything’s honest, I’ll gladly accept the results,” Trump told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel last week. “If it’s not, you have to fight for the right of the country.”
Darkly, Trump has also warned that if he loses the election there would be “bedlam” and a “bloodbath for the country.” These words referred, in part, to the fallout Trump predicted for the auto industry, but have distinct echoes of his false charges that he lost to US President Joe Biden in 2020 due to fraud.
At a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on April 13, right before his first criminal trial in New York began, Trump repeated his bogus claims about his 2020 defeat: “The election was rigged. Pure and simple, 2020 was rigged. We could never let it happen again.”
At the same rally, he blasted Juan Merchan, the judge who oversees his trial in Manhattan. In that case, Trump faces 34 counts for altering company records in 2016 to hide US$130,000 in hush-money payments that his fixer Michael Cohen made to the porn star Stormy Daniels, who alleged an affair with him.
“I have a crooked judge,” Trump said about Merchan, adding that he was “fully gagged before a highly conflicted and corrupt judge, who suffers from TDS … Trump Derangement Syndrome.”
Trump’s multiple attacks on witnesses and jurors, who he had been told were off limits and could spur a contempt citation, have prompted Merchan twice to fine Trump a total of US$10,000 for contravening a gag order against such attacks.
“The court will not tolerate continued willful violations of its lawful orders,” the judge has said, warning that Trump could face jail time if he made similar attacks.
Trump insists without evidence that the more than seven dozen federal and state criminal charges he faces in four jurisdictions are “election interference,” and says he has done nothing illegal.
Former prosecutors and judges say Trump’s incendiary rhetoric is catnip to his Make America Great Again allies and could spur violence this year.
“At its core, the promise of pardons by Trump signals to anyone prone to insurrectionist behavior that they can expect a get out of jail card free,” said former federal judge John Jones, who is now president of Dickinson College.
“My fear is that we will have civil unrest that will impede the election. My concern is that you can have vigilante groups under the guise of ‘stop the steal,’ patrolling polling places and intimidating voters,” he said.
Jones added that “every one of the Jan. 6 defendants has had appropriate due process.”
“They have either been convicted or pled guilty to substantial federal crimes,” he said. “Promising them pardons in the face of that is against every principle in our system of justice.”
Regarding Trump’s ongoing claims that the 2020 election was rigged and that the country would see a “bloodbath” if he loses again, Jones said: “The word ‘bloodbath’ is not ambiguous. The last time Trump fomented this kind of post-election destructiveness, people lost their lives.”
Ex-federal prosecutors raise similar concerns.
“To the extent president Trump is dangling pardons of the J6 [Jan. 6] defendants he is, in effect, trying to eliminate the deterrent effect of criminal prosecutions with the anticipated result of making violence on his own behalf more likely,” former prosecutor Paul Rosenzweig said.
“From a legal perspective, deterrence is critical. The threats of violence in 2024 can only be mitigated by strong, consistent prosecution for violent acts in 2020,” he said.
Concerns about the potentially dangerous fallout from Trump’s attacks on the electoral and legal systems are underscored by a Brennan Center study late last month, which showed 38 percent of more than 925 local election officials surveyed had experienced “threats, harassment or abuse.”
The Brennan survey, conducted in February and March, also found that 54 percent of those surveyed were worried about the safety of fellow workers, and 62 percent were concerned about political leaders trying to interfere with how they do their jobs.
On a related track, US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who has handled a number of cases involving Jan. 6 insurrectionists, has warned starkly about the dangers of more violence this year. Chutkan, who is slated to oversee Trump’s trial on charges by the special counsel Jack Smith that he sought to subvert the 2020 election, echoed Rosenzweig’s warning that more violence is less likely to happen if those convicted or who have pleaded guilty for the Jan. 6 attack receive appropriate sentences.
Last month, Chutkan issued a stiff sentence of 66 months for one insurgent who attacked the Capitol and has called the Jan. 6 violent US Capitol attack by Trump allies that led to injuries of 140 police officers “as serious a crisis as this nation has ever faced.”
Chutkan said that “extremism is alive and well in this country. Threats of violence continue unabated.”
Ex-prosecutors also say that Trump’s attacks on the legal system are alarming.
“Trump’s persistent denigration of the legal system is surely as divisive as everything else he does because he’s lying,” said former US Department of Justice official Ty Cobb, who worked as a White House counsel for part of the Trump administration. “Trump’s lies in this area seem to have been embraced by his followers as truth.”
Cobb said that “Trump has not been unfairly targeted by the justice department or the Biden administration, but charged only with serious crimes he has committed. The two state cases in which Trump stands criminally indicted have nothing to do with the Biden administration.”
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS