The 77th World Health Assembly will be held in Geneva, on May 27–June 1 this year. The theme of this year is All for Health, Health for All. Regrettably, Taiwan remains the WHA’s missing link.
In analyzing global health politics, it is evident that the challenges are vast and complex. Overcoming them demands unified, unbiased efforts, transcending political or territorial divides.
Granting Taiwan observer status in WHA will not only serve the vulnerable with measurable impact for 23.9 million inhabitants but also provide the World Health Organization (WHO), which holds the WHA, with crucial data on global health issues.
Taiwan has sought to participate as an observer in forums such as the WHA, but China has argued that under UN Resolution 2758, Taiwan is part of China and cannot be a separate UN member.
However, the resolution did not preclude Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the UN system or in any other multilateral forum.
Speaking at a seminar held by the German Marshall Fund, US Deputy Assistant Secretary for China and Taiwan Mark Lambert called for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the international community at a time when China is increasingly misusing Resolution 2758.
Acute health emergencies affect millions of people around the world each year and keeping the world safe and protecting the vulnerable are top priorities for the WHA. The WHO works with countries and partners to prepare for, prevent, detect and respond to disease outbreaks and other health emergencies.
Taiwan is a highly capable, engaged and responsible member of the global health community. Taiwan should leverage the international support it received during the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to mobilize strong opposition to and clarification of Resolution 2758 in Taiwan’s meaningful participation and observership at the WHA.
The Biden administration’s immediate priority is to strongly counter and clarify Resolution 2758, as Taiwan is a very capable health partner. The exclusion of Taiwan has raised concerns over the intersection of geopolitics and global health imperatives. Let Taiwan join the 77th session of the World Health Assembly.
Kent Wang is advisory commissioner for the Overseas Community Affairs Council, Republic of China (Taiwan) in the US.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS