The US Congress recently passed the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act” by an overwhelming majority, which requires TikTok to divest from its Chinese parent company ByteDance within six months or face a ban on its operations in the US. The high level of alert towards TikTok’s risks in the US is evident.
As a Taiwanese legislator, I believe we should also take proactive action by enacting relevant legislation to regulate TikTok to safeguard national security and societal interests.
Many view TikTok as just an ordinary video-sharing platform, but in reality, it can serve as a tool for the Chinese government to conduct surveillance and cognitive warfare against other countries. As a Chinese enterprise, ByteDance must comply with Chinese laws and cooperate with the Chinese government in providing user data. This data is at risk of being leaked and could be used for espionage activities against Taiwan.
Although TikTok’s CEO has repeatedly denied any illegal actions by the company and claimed to have cut ties with ByteDance, up to 11 former TikTok employees have said that TikTok still closely cooperates with ByteDance.
TikTok sends personal data of US users to its headquarters in Beijing every 14 days, including names, accounts, IP locations and demographic information, for ByteDance’s monitoring and statistical purposes, they said.
This practice of transmitting user privacy data back to China is highly concerning. The Chinese government has repeatedly used data obtained by enterprises to compromise the national security of other countries. With TikTok’s vast user database, it is naturally prone to exploitation by the Chinese government.
The Chinese authorities could also manipulate TikTok’s algorithms to promote narratives that are favorable to them, influence public opinion and even affect foreign elections.
US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines has warned that China might use TikTok to spread misinformation during this year’s US elections.
As a prime target for China, Taiwan should be especially vigilant.
There are about 5 million active TikTok users in Taiwan, with 57 percent under the age of 40, making them a key demographic for Chinese infiltration and influence, statistics showed. A significant focus of Beijing’s Taiwan strategy is to divide Taiwanese society, weaken the Taiwanese’s sense of crisis and implement “asymmetric infiltration” in political, economic and cultural aspects. TikTok is a strategic tool used by China to achieve this purpose.
Beyond national security concerns, TikTok also poses a risk in the shaping of social norms. Content promoting suicide, eating disorders and numerous dangerous challenges pervasive on TikTok pose severe threats to the physical and mental health of the youth.
The “blackout challenge” on TikTok has led to the deaths of at least 20 children under the age of 15 within 18 months, data showed.
I absolutely cannot condone TikTok’s irreversible impact on our next generation.
Due to the significant threats posed by TikTok to national security and societal norms, I have already cosponsored legislation targeting TikTok for leaking user personal information and digital footprints for advertising purposes, granting the government the authority to demand digital platforms to alert users or remove content. I will draw from the US’ approach to propose legislation restricting TikTok’s operations in Taiwan. I implore the executive branch, especially the Digital Development Department, to take TikTok’s threats to Taiwan seriously and actively implement countermeasures.
Chen Kuan-ting currently serves as the member of Foreign and National Defense Committee at the Legislative Yuan (MP) representing Chiayi County Constituency 2. He was formerly the Special Assistant to the DPP Chairperson President Tsai Ing-wen, the CEO of Taiwan NextGen Foundation, a researcher in Taiwan’s National Development Council, and also an Adjunct Lecturer at Tamkang University’s department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s