The Lienchiang County Government is superseding the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by giving county residents prepaid transportation cards. Residents who travel to Fuzhou and spend money would be provided with discounts. In doing this, the government is voluntarily serving the CCP’s Taiwan Policy.
The Lienchiang County Government’s behavior severely infringes upon civil servants’ obligations toward and pledge of loyalty to Taiwan.
Lienchiang County’s budget last year was about NT$4.6 billion (US$142 million). If this amount were divided among Matsu’s 13,200 residents, each person would receive an average of NT$350,000. The Lienchiang County government has instead decided to help the CCP take control of the area, “selling” the people of Matsu to the CCP for a mere 300 Chinese yuan.
County governments are public entities. The tenets of civil service clearly stipulate that civil servants pledge their loyalty to our country . Despite the Lienchiang County government setting an illegal example, the County magistrate was elected by the public and should act according to the regulations that govern all civil servants.
Civil servants working under the county government have an even stronger obligation to abide by the law. They must not accept the government’s illegal instructions and do things that encroach on national interests.
In Taiwan, accounting and human affairs personnel are under the control of the central system. Thus, political units should fulfill the function of directing and supervising the government’s conduct. The Control Yuan should motion for the impeachment of Lienchiang’s civil servants.
The spirit of political autonomy lies in providing a place with the ability to handle its own general affairs. It enables administrative efficacy and independent handling of matters.
It is not meant to be a limitless expansion that extends beyond national borders. Nor is it meant to reach a point where administrative actions contravene national interests.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS