The Lienchiang County Government is superseding the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by giving county residents prepaid transportation cards. Residents who travel to Fuzhou and spend money would be provided with discounts. In doing this, the government is voluntarily serving the CCP’s Taiwan Policy.
The Lienchiang County Government’s behavior severely infringes upon civil servants’ obligations toward and pledge of loyalty to Taiwan.
Lienchiang County’s budget last year was about NT$4.6 billion (US$142 million). If this amount were divided among Matsu’s 13,200 residents, each person would receive an average of NT$350,000. The Lienchiang County government has instead decided to help the CCP take control of the area, “selling” the people of Matsu to the CCP for a mere 300 Chinese yuan.
County governments are public entities. The tenets of civil service clearly stipulate that civil servants pledge their loyalty to our country . Despite the Lienchiang County government setting an illegal example, the County magistrate was elected by the public and should act according to the regulations that govern all civil servants.
Civil servants working under the county government have an even stronger obligation to abide by the law. They must not accept the government’s illegal instructions and do things that encroach on national interests.
In Taiwan, accounting and human affairs personnel are under the control of the central system. Thus, political units should fulfill the function of directing and supervising the government’s conduct. The Control Yuan should motion for the impeachment of Lienchiang’s civil servants.
The spirit of political autonomy lies in providing a place with the ability to handle its own general affairs. It enables administrative efficacy and independent handling of matters.
It is not meant to be a limitless expansion that extends beyond national borders. Nor is it meant to reach a point where administrative actions contravene national interests.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS