A proposal from Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) to restrict elected representatives from visiting China was on Tuesday blocked from being put on the discussion roster by the legislature’s Procedure Committee.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) also objected to the proposal and separately proposed prioritizing measures to allow Chinese tourists to visit Kinmen, Penghu and Lienchiang counties.
It is concerning that some would object to restricting travel to China by officials given the state of the cross-strait relationship, although it is expected from the KMT.
There has been a surge in activity around Taiwan by Chinese vessels and aircraft in the past few weeks, which analysts say is intended as a form of intimidation ahead of the inauguration of president-elect William Lai (賴清德) on May 20.
On Monday, four China Coast Guard ships briefly sailed in prohibited waters near Kinmen County, with officials saying such incursions “endanger navigation safety.”
On Friday last week, the Ministry of National Defense reported that 17 Chinese aircraft had “crossed the median line and entered Taiwan’s northern and central air defense identification zone.”
That follows a record-high single-day number of incursions reported on March 22, when the ministry said it had “detected 36 Chinese military aircraft and six naval ships operating around Taiwan” within a 24 hour period.
On Jan. 30, China announced that it would change its M503 flight route, bringing it closer to the median line of the Taiwan Strait. One military researcher at KMT-affiliated think tank the National Policy Foundation said the move would “squeeze the reaction time” of Taiwan’s military in the event of an attempted invasion by China’s military.
The KMT’s efforts to boost ties with China are understandable given that it has always seen Taiwan and China as part of a single China, which was the basis for the so-called “1992 consensus” between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) in January said during campaigning amid his presidential bid as the KMT’s candidate that, if elected, he would “not touch on the unification issue.”
That is fitting, given the results of a survey by the National Chengchi University Election Study Center published on Feb. 23, which showed that more than 80 percent of respondents wanted to maintain the “status quo” with China, while only 1.2 percent wanted unification as soon as possible.
China is clearly the aggressor and although Beijing would say it is only targeting the DPP and what it sees as “separatists,” that clearly means it is targeting ordinary Taiwanese, given that they elected Lai.
As a hostile power, China could easily be described as an enemy state, especially given that it has said unification is inevitable.
It is odd and concerning that the issue of banning travel to China by elected Taiwanese officials cannot even be discussed in the legislature. If for no other reason, a travel ban might curb instances of political, military and corporate espionage, which have become rampant.
Visits to China by elected officials represent a national security risk and there must be discussion on banning such travel.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS