A proposal from Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) to restrict elected representatives from visiting China was on Tuesday blocked from being put on the discussion roster by the legislature’s Procedure Committee.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) also objected to the proposal and separately proposed prioritizing measures to allow Chinese tourists to visit Kinmen, Penghu and Lienchiang counties.
It is concerning that some would object to restricting travel to China by officials given the state of the cross-strait relationship, although it is expected from the KMT.
There has been a surge in activity around Taiwan by Chinese vessels and aircraft in the past few weeks, which analysts say is intended as a form of intimidation ahead of the inauguration of president-elect William Lai (賴清德) on May 20.
On Monday, four China Coast Guard ships briefly sailed in prohibited waters near Kinmen County, with officials saying such incursions “endanger navigation safety.”
On Friday last week, the Ministry of National Defense reported that 17 Chinese aircraft had “crossed the median line and entered Taiwan’s northern and central air defense identification zone.”
That follows a record-high single-day number of incursions reported on March 22, when the ministry said it had “detected 36 Chinese military aircraft and six naval ships operating around Taiwan” within a 24 hour period.
On Jan. 30, China announced that it would change its M503 flight route, bringing it closer to the median line of the Taiwan Strait. One military researcher at KMT-affiliated think tank the National Policy Foundation said the move would “squeeze the reaction time” of Taiwan’s military in the event of an attempted invasion by China’s military.
The KMT’s efforts to boost ties with China are understandable given that it has always seen Taiwan and China as part of a single China, which was the basis for the so-called “1992 consensus” between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) in January said during campaigning amid his presidential bid as the KMT’s candidate that, if elected, he would “not touch on the unification issue.”
That is fitting, given the results of a survey by the National Chengchi University Election Study Center published on Feb. 23, which showed that more than 80 percent of respondents wanted to maintain the “status quo” with China, while only 1.2 percent wanted unification as soon as possible.
China is clearly the aggressor and although Beijing would say it is only targeting the DPP and what it sees as “separatists,” that clearly means it is targeting ordinary Taiwanese, given that they elected Lai.
As a hostile power, China could easily be described as an enemy state, especially given that it has said unification is inevitable.
It is odd and concerning that the issue of banning travel to China by elected Taiwanese officials cannot even be discussed in the legislature. If for no other reason, a travel ban might curb instances of political, military and corporate espionage, which have become rampant.
Visits to China by elected officials represent a national security risk and there must be discussion on banning such travel.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS