If a company’s overhead for creating products rises, but their prices remain the same, it would eventually shut down.
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) is the nation’s only electricity provider. If it were to shut down, would people be fine without electricity? Unless people are willing to revert to living in a cave, then the answer is an emphatic “no.”
At first glance, a planned freeze of energy prices looks like a good thing as the cost of living burden would not increase.
However, this is a poisoned chalice. The “poison” is that the public would eventually pick up the bill for Taipower’s losses — unless they want to live without electricity.
There is no such thing as a free lunch.
Taiwan has always had proportionately low residential electricity use, but massive use by companies and industrial consumers.
Taking into consideration that consumption levels vary among users, the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Electricity Price Review Committee met last month and advocated a bill that would adjust rates based on usage tiers.
Low energy users, who make up 68 percent of all electricity consumers, would only face a 3 percent rate increase, while the rate for the other 32 percent would rise based on the amount of electricity used.
The largest increase for small businesses that use more than 3,001 kilowatt-hours of electricity per year would be 10 percent.
For industrial consumers, their rate increase would be based on their usage, with tiers from 500 million kilowatt-hours to 15 billion kilowatt-hours facing increases of 10 to 25 percent.
The vast majority of large-scale consumers fall within the lowest maximum rate increase of 15 percent.
According to the committee’s proposal, large industrial firms that use a lot of electricity would bear a greater responsibility for electricity production costs, so what would happen if there were a freeze on electricity rate increases?
The large consumers would have the greatest savings. Small-scale consumers would not face rate increases, but their savings would be limited, as Taipower’s losses would be picked up in the form of taxes footed by everyone.
International Energy Agency estimates show that people born in the 1950s generate 350 tonnes of carbon dioxide on average in their lifetime, while people born between 1997 to 2012 generate about 110 tonnes.
However, people born in the 2020s are expected to generate only about 34 tonnes in their lifetime.
It is shameful that those born after 2020 are to be saddled with the burden of the environmental devastation caused by previous generations.
By the same reasoning, if today’s electricity rates do not increase, it would only force greater debt onto tomorrow’s generations.
Moreover, those who use electricity the least would be helping those who use it the most.
Freezing electricity rates is a good option only for those who want to rob the poor to enrich the wealthy, reinforce Taiwan’s wealth gap and make life much harder for young people.
Chen Ping-hei is a professor in National Taiwan University’s Department of Mechanical Engineering. Chiang Ya-chi is a professor in National Taiwan Ocean University’s Department of Ocean Law and Policy.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS