The European Commission and associated national enforcement agencies conducted unannounced inspections of the Polish and Dutch subsidiaries of Chinese security scanner manufacturer Nuctech Co (同方威視) on Tuesday last week. The raids were carried out under the EU’s Foreign Subsidies Rule (FSR).
Former Chinese president Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) son, Hu Haifeng (胡海峰), was the former chairman of Nuctech, which is regarded as a China-controlled company and was, for a time, listed on the US Bureau of Industry and Security’s Entity List.
Although several countries have raised doubts and issued warnings regarding Nuctech’s security inspection equipment, which includes X-ray machines for baggage and cargo passing through customs, the company has won procurement contracts in several European countries that add up to more than 110 million euros (US$118 million).
For example, the southern Polish city of Rzeszow, which is the main hub for Western arms supplies to Ukraine, last month signed a contract for Nuctech X-ray equipment costing 3.5 million euros. This raises the possibility that China could use the equipment to provide intelligence to Russia. In fact, the Chinese government might well have used such devices’ connections with EU customs declaration systems to obtain substantial data about goods entering and leaving the EU.
Although Europe has long been on the alert about the security issues of Chinese electronic products, when confronted with security concerns regarding 5G devices, EU countries did not have a consistent way of dealing with the issue. Less than half of EU member states have followed the example of the US and Canada by banning Huawei (華為) products. This reveals a difficulty in implementing measures regarding cybersecurity. However, the EU’s decision to base its recent raids on the FSR indicates that it has, within the framework of existing laws, found a tool that kills two birds with one stone: Addressing cybersecurity worries about China while upholding fair market competition and safeguarding the interests of EU businesses.
The huge subsidies that Chinese businesses receive from the government enable them to drastically cut production costs and dump cheap products all over the world, distorting markets and breaching the principle of fairness.
China’s sluggish economy and wilting domestic market have led to excess productive capacity, which is causing worry in Europe and North America. In the past few years, the EU has conducted anti-dumping investigations into various Chinese goods, including electric vehicles, medical equipment, lithium batteries, solar power equipment, components and raw materials.
French lawmaker Antoine Vermorel-Marques has proposed a bill to rein in the “fast fashion” style of business practiced by China-based companies such as Shein and Temu, which is a subsidiary of Pinduoduo (拼多多). The signs are that a trade war between Europe and China could break out at any time.
Taiwan’s market has also been flooded with cheap Chinese goods. Notably, e-commerce merchants source many of their products from China, which is sure to have a negative impact on Taiwanese industry. There are also potential safety hazards, including concerns about national security, cybersecurity and food safety.
Taiwan’s government would be well advised to follow the example of European and North American countries by levying additional tariffs on Chinese goods. This would increase tax revenue, safeguard fair market competition and guard against any malicious intentions that China might have.
Hong Tsun-ming is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS