In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China.
This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said.
The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past few decades, including a demographic dividend and benign security environment, are becoming headwinds, as its population starts to shrink and the US and its allies step up their containment.
However, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has yet to achieve his ambitious goals of placing China at the heart of a new international order and bringing Taiwan under Chinese sovereignty, they said.
Indeed, foremost on Brands’ and Beckley’s minds was Taiwan. Not only is Taiwanese public opinion trending in the opposite direction for Xi — with those identifying as Chinese at historic lows — but also Taiwan’s long-delayed defense reforms are soon to come online. In addition, allied cooperation to defend the nation is only deepening.
They called this the “danger zone” — a period of near-term maximum danger where Beijing, losing confidence that time is on its side, might strike before the US and its allies have fully prepared to meet the China challenge.
However, these views of China in decline are “both ill-advised and premature,” Georgetown University Initiative for US-China Dialogue on Global Issues senior fellow Evan Medeiros wrote in Foreign Affairs this month in “The Delusion of Peak China.”
“Xi still believes China is rising,” Medeiros said, adding that “many Chinese elites, including Xi, believe it is the US that is in terminal decline. For them, even if China is slowing down, the power gap between the countries is still narrowing in China’s favor.”
“Xi remains committed to the idea that China still enjoys what he calls a ‘period of strategic opportunity,’” Medeiros said. “The CCP’s official history of the last 100 years, released in 2021, stated that China is ‘closer to the center of the world stage than it has ever been,’ and that it ‘has never been closer to its own rebirth.’”
For Taiwan, it is good if China believes that time is on its side, as this should forestall Xi from acting rashly. As the recent visit of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians to China showed, Beijing still thinks it can further its “peaceful unification” goals short of war. However, this should not lull the nation into a false sense of security.
Brands and Beckley said the China challenge would be short, sharp and intense, while Medeiros said the China challenge would be a complex competition over the long term.
For Taiwanese, it would be prudent to view the China challenge as an intense, multifaceted, urgent and immediate threat, to spur the much-needed defense reforms, national awareness and diplomatic support for the nation.
Medeiros might be right that Xi feels like time is on his side, but this could change at any moment. With Beijing’s slowing economy, and if the US’ technology controls and allied containment of China have a stifling effect, a sense of malaise and urgency could soon set in.
History is littered with examples — Japan in 1941, Germany in 1914 and Russia in 2022 — of great powers betting the house on an invasion, because they think the alternative is gradual decline. Yes, the China challenge will be long and enduring, but for Taiwan it is also immediate and urgent.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
RSS