I am in Taiwan on a mission on behalf of the Global Committee for the Rule of Law, a Rome-based association named after the late Marco Pannella, an Italian civil rights leader and member of the European Parliament. The committee is chaired by former Italian minister of foreign affairs, Senator Giulio Terzi di Sant’Agata.
Having learned that the Constitutional Court of Taiwan is to spend several months deliberating the issue of the death penalty and its legality, my mind rushed back to the international movement that led to the adoption of a UN moratorium on capital punishment in 2007.
Back in 1993, Pannella established an association called Hands Off Cain to convince the Italian government and other cosponsors to introduce a resolution at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) promoting a one-year moratorium on all capital punishment.
Fourteen years later, the resolution was presented at the UNGA and the vote was successful.
These were 14 years of debating, lobbying MPs and governments, collecting statistical evidence and negotiating over two main messages: First, the death penalty is not a reliable deterrent. Second, the goal was not immediate abolition, but rather an official one-year moratorium to be renewed on a yearly basis until the time was ripe for full abolition.
In 2007, the UNGA adopted the moratorium with 104 votes in favor while 54 opposed, and it has taken a vote every two years ever since. In 2022, when the last vote took place, the number of states in favor increased to 125 and the number of those who opposed fell to 37.
Since 2007, the adoption has seen major progress and reveals a clear trend: It is striking that the US still votes in favor of capital punishment alongside autocracies like Iran, Iraq, North Korea and China. If it was possible for Taiwan to join the UN, one could only wonder how Taipei would instruct its representatives ahead of the vote for a moratorium in the assembly of the international community.
Indeed, the evidence collected in countries where no executions were carried out for several years showed that crime rates were not impacted significantly.
“The murder rate in non-death penalty states has remained consistently lower than the rate in states with the death penalty,” the Death Penalty Information Center said.
As Virginia Democratic state assembly member Marcus Simon said during a debate to abolish the death penalty in the US state, “the government should not be in the business of killing human beings.”
Deterrence could also be achieved through alternative measures, including life imprisonment. It would also rule out the possibility of executing an innocent defendant.
Sure, societies present many differences. However, by saying “no” to violence, the state becomes the guardian of life under all circumstances. It sets a concrete example and sends the message that killing has no place in any society.
With the exception of one execution carried out in 2020, Taiwan has not put anybody to death for about a decade. Thus, it seems to me that a de facto moratorium is already in place. If the majority of Taiwanese are still in favor of the death penalty, a process of familiarization with a hypothetical reform might be underway.
Should change come, the adoption of a moratorium — to be confirmed or suspended on a one-year basis — is a path worth exploring. It is also a democratic path that nurtures the rule of law that Taiwan proudly embodies.
Mateo Angioli is a political advisor to Italian Senator Giulio Terzi and secretary general of the Global Committee for the Rule of Law “Marco Pennella” of the Italian Senate.
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS