While the South China Sea has remained a contested region for a long time, it has emerged as a major security flashpoint in the 21st century with the rise of China as an economic and military power. China’s recent moves against the Philippines are therefore seen as Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) imperialistic orientation toward this region and beyond.
However, the latest episode of China’s aggressive posturing must also be seen as a part of its larger approach toward the Indo-Pacific region.
First, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s efforts to strengthen his country’s alliance with the US were seen as a challenge to China’s dominance in the South China Sea. Consequently, Beijing decided to punish the Philippines for preferring the US over China.
Second, with the US being preoccupied with the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war, as well as the exchange of strikes between Iran and Israel, Beijing attempted to test Washington’s desire to fulfill its commitment to its allies, partners and friends in the region.
Third, the return of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to power for a third straight presidential term in January’s election and the global response toward the earthquake in Hualien County on April 3 has shaken the Chinese regime. It was precisely why Beijing tried to undermine Taiwan’s independent existence by thanking the world for its concerns about the latter. At the same time, Xi’s meeting with former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was intended to send a message to the outside world about China’s interference in Taiwan’s domestic affairs and in the region.
Fourth, during the 19th biennial meeting of the Western Pacific Naval Symposium in Qingdao, where China’s northern naval force is based, Beijing used the opportunity to showcase its military expansion. More to the point, one of China’s top military leaders took a harsh line on regional territorial disputes, telling the international naval gathering that the country would strike back with force if its interests came under threat in an opaque reference to Taiwan.
Fifth, China’s refusal to accept the international arbitral tribunal decision of 2016 in favor of the Philippines has underlined Beijing’s inherent contempt for global institutions.
Sixth, China is aware of increasing cooperation among the US, Japan, India, Taiwan, Australia and other countries to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific region. This in turn would limit China’s access to the South China Sea.
After all, the Chinese communist regime wishes to establish its dominance in this region through which 60 percent of global maritime trade passes. China also wants to have absolute control over the available natural resources in the South China Sea including oil, gas and hydrocarbons.
Whatever strategic, security and economic and other considerations China has in the South China Sea, the response from the Philippines, the US, Taiwan, Japan, India and other countries have pushed China into a corner. Unlike in the past, the global community has become more vocal in criticizing China’s efforts to militarize the region. For example, US President Joe Biden has warned China that the US would defend the Philippines in case of any attack in the disputed South China Sea.
The joint statement, which was issued after the first-ever meeting among the heads of the Philippines, the US and Japan in Washington last month, stated: “We express our serious concerns about the People’s Republic of China’s [PRC] dangerous and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea.”
The G7 also issued a statement saying: “There is no legal basis for China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea, and we oppose China’s militarization, coercive and intimidation activities in the South China Sea.”
More importantly, China’s coercive actions failed to intimidate the Philippines and other countries in the region. In fact, Manila issued strong statements against China’s “dangerous maneuvers.” The Philippine Department of National Defense has signed or entered discussions over new security agreements with at least 18 countries since a Chinese coast guard vessel flashed a military-grade laser at a Philippine coast guard ship in the South China Sea last year.
In a major development, the ASEAN began its first joint naval exercise last year largely in response to China’s belligerent posturing in the region. Last year, Malaysia rejected the latest edition of the “standard map of China” that lays claim to almost the entire South China Sea, including areas off the coast of Malaysian Borneo.
Undoubtedly, the US has once again reiterated its commitment to helping its allies and partners in promoting peace, security and development in the region. The deployment of a US mid-range missile launcher in the Philippines would help Manila prepare to defend its territories amid geopolitical tension over the South China Sea.
India has also provided four batteries of supersonic cruise missiles (BrahMos) to the Philippines. The Czech Republic, Germany, Italy and Sweden have offered to supply drones and submarines.
Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong (黃英賢) announced A$64 million (US$41.75 million) in funding for maritime security in the South China Sea.
The regional and global reaction to China’s unilateralism in the South China Sea is a welcome development for Taiwan. After all, the development of a strong containment plan against China is in Taiwan’s interest.
At the same time, the change in the attitude of regional countries would surely work as a tool of deterrence for Taipei against Beijing. Efforts should be taken to further consolidate cooperation to protect the South China Sea from Chinese coercion.
Sumit Kumar is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Delhi and a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS