At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy.
Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused nine deaths and was followed by numerous aftershocks, Fu, who represents Hualien, insisted on leading a delegation of 17 KMT lawmakers to Beijing from April 26 to 28 and met with senior Chinese officials.
China’s partial reopening, which KMT lawmakers have smugly touted, does not compare in any which way to the damage inflicted by its unilateral bans on cross-strait tourism and agricultural trade in recent years.
Beijing has banned Chinese independent tourism to Taiwan since 2019, and group tours since 2020, despite Taiwan resuming independent travel to China after the COVID-19 pandemic and announcing that it is ready to resume cross-strait group tours as long as China reciprocates the measure.
However, Beijing this time has only permitted tourism from China’s Fujian Province to Taiwan’s outlying island of Matsu, but not Kinmen or Penghu — the destinations that more than 90 percent of Chinese tourists would visit via the “small three links.”
China also announced that Fujian residents would be allowed to visit Taiwan proper once express ferry services between Fujian’s Pingtan County and Taiwan resumed.
It also urged Taiwan to resume direct air flights between Taiwan and 30 major Chinese cities. However, the load factor of direct flights is very low because of China’s travel restrictions.
As for the resumption of imports of Taiwanese pomelos, the Chinese authorities said it is based on “scientific assessments in accordance with China’s laws and regulations.”
However, China has never dealt with Taiwan on the basis of international scientific rules or through established mechanisms, but only based on political manipulation, as shown in unilateral bans on Taiwanese products and lifting of restrictions when pro-China politicians visit.
China’s openness is not only limited, but is also based on political prerequisites, which was evident when Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) told Fu to uphold China’s version of the so-called “1992 consensus” and the “one China principle” and to foil “attempts to split Taiwan and China apart” — a clear denial of the free will and self-determination of Taiwanese.
Some people and groups which the KMT delegation met with even called for the abolition of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透) and to amend regulations on national security.
The KMT’s so-called “ice-breaking” trip could be the tip of the iceberg that risks Taiwan’s sovereignty and security.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS