At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy.
Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused nine deaths and was followed by numerous aftershocks, Fu, who represents Hualien, insisted on leading a delegation of 17 KMT lawmakers to Beijing from April 26 to 28 and met with senior Chinese officials.
China’s partial reopening, which KMT lawmakers have smugly touted, does not compare in any which way to the damage inflicted by its unilateral bans on cross-strait tourism and agricultural trade in recent years.
Beijing has banned Chinese independent tourism to Taiwan since 2019, and group tours since 2020, despite Taiwan resuming independent travel to China after the COVID-19 pandemic and announcing that it is ready to resume cross-strait group tours as long as China reciprocates the measure.
However, Beijing this time has only permitted tourism from China’s Fujian Province to Taiwan’s outlying island of Matsu, but not Kinmen or Penghu — the destinations that more than 90 percent of Chinese tourists would visit via the “small three links.”
China also announced that Fujian residents would be allowed to visit Taiwan proper once express ferry services between Fujian’s Pingtan County and Taiwan resumed.
It also urged Taiwan to resume direct air flights between Taiwan and 30 major Chinese cities. However, the load factor of direct flights is very low because of China’s travel restrictions.
As for the resumption of imports of Taiwanese pomelos, the Chinese authorities said it is based on “scientific assessments in accordance with China’s laws and regulations.”
However, China has never dealt with Taiwan on the basis of international scientific rules or through established mechanisms, but only based on political manipulation, as shown in unilateral bans on Taiwanese products and lifting of restrictions when pro-China politicians visit.
China’s openness is not only limited, but is also based on political prerequisites, which was evident when Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧) told Fu to uphold China’s version of the so-called “1992 consensus” and the “one China principle” and to foil “attempts to split Taiwan and China apart” — a clear denial of the free will and self-determination of Taiwanese.
Some people and groups which the KMT delegation met with even called for the abolition of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透) and to amend regulations on national security.
The KMT’s so-called “ice-breaking” trip could be the tip of the iceberg that risks Taiwan’s sovereignty and security.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s