US Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel is known for not mincing his words. What has surprised is his target: the folks back home.
“I have a message for all the experts back in Washington: You don’t know Japan of today,” the former White House chief of staff for former US president Barack Obama said in January, citing advice he was given before taking his post about the need to tread slowly and softly. “Their predictions of what the future of Japan would be were myths. Japan has busted every one of those myths.”
I usually avoid the Tokyo embassy scene, but reached out to Emanuel because his take resonated. One of my great frustrations is with how Japan is perceived outside it, leading to what I have called a “comprehension gap” that reduces the country to stereotypes — or simply ignores it. Here was perhaps the first senior political figure I could recall making the same argument as mine, which is why I sought his perspective for my column to declare an end to Japan’s era of “lost decades.”
Illustration: Mountain People
“It is a different Japan,” he agreed when we spoke last week. “The United States has to update the way it thinks about Japan.”
Previous ambassadors, assuming they had much of a profile at all, often spent more time telling their host nation what to do — an approach that could grate, given Japan’s history as a US-occupied nation and Tokyo’s desire to be treated as an equal partner.
Former US ambassador to Japan Caroline Kennedy, the only recent envoy with a profile on par with Emanuel’s, ruffled feathers across the country when she criticized the Taiji dolphin hunt. Her office also issued a rare criticism of then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine in 2013, just weeks after she took over.
By contrast, Emanuel is effusive in his praise — indeed, at times he seems to go above and beyond and stray into active boosting of the government, which might be more controversial if there were a more realistic prospect that Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party might lose power. (That still seems fanciful.)
I met the former Chicago mayor at the ambassador’s residence in Tokyo’s Akasaka district, beside the previously sleepy Toranomon quarter that has been transformed by a stunning redevelopment over the past decade. The historic low-rise residence, where Emperor Hirohito met with US general Douglas MacArthur in 1945, is now surrounded by glass skyscrapers.
It was late on a Friday afternoon, and Emanuel seemed to be feeling the effects of the week, having flown back to Washington for Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s recent state visit. Nonetheless, he lights up while discussing achievements in boosting national and regional security — at least, as seen from Washington’s perspective — put in place by Kishida.
“The guy implemented the most radical changes — in two years, not 20, without a single protest,” he said.
Emanuel lists the changes under the Kishida administration, including a relaxation of defense export rules, plans to raise national security spending to 2 percent of GDP and add counterstrike capabilities, and the smoothing of ties with South Korea. Despite his long time in power, Abe faced greater difficulty enacting much smaller changes.
Rahm contrasts the silence on Tokyo’s streets with protests in many democracies over varying domestic and international policies, from France to South Korea to the uproar in US universities.
“As a former chief of staff, I’m kind of impressed,” he said.
Kishida has benefited from the dramatic shift that has moved the US and China to strategic adversaries. When it comes to the subject of Beijing, we see the Emanuel that Japan might have expected when his appointment was first floated in the media — combative, hard-edged and distinctly undiplomatic.
He seems to enjoy needling China, and sometimes appears freer to speak about Beijing than his host country — such as his blasting of Chinese “hypocrisy” over the discharge of treated water from the damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. If reports last year that he was told by aides to US President Joe Biden to dial it back were true, the request was ineffective: Just this week, he wrote on X about a “Chinese pattern of plunder” surrounding allegations of doping in Olympic swimming and spying on European companies.
Emanuel also likes to hold Japan as a mirror to his own country to show the US where it has gone wrong, frequently raising the example of spotting young children walking home from school, alone or in groups, without fear of violence.
If there is one area he has strayed into controversy, it is his support for LGBTQ rights: Nationalists online decry what they see as his interference in Japan’s sovereignty with his calls for Japan to legalize same-sex marriage. Ironically, he has also taken flak from the other side too, with his backing of last year’s toothless legislation aimed at preventing LGBTQ discrimination.
Emanuel’s future in the country would depend on what is being called “moshi Tora” in Japan, meaning “if Trump” — the prospect of former US president Donald Trump triumphing in November’s election. Tokyo was caught badly off-guard by Trump’s surprise victory in 2016, necessitating an ingratiating emergency trip to the US by Abe to establish ties.
This week showed that Tokyo is taking no chances this time, with former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso dispatched to meet Trump in New York. Politically appointed ambassadors typically step down after a change in the White House — and Emanuel’s typically blunt work as a political commentator during the 2020 elections means any exception for him would seem unlikely.
For now, Emanuel’s the global cheerleader the Japanese badly need. He has a good story to tell — and he tells it better than most of Japan’s leaders. He is right about one thing: Regardless of who is in the White House next year, the US must update the way it sees its most vital Asian ally.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS