US Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel is known for not mincing his words. What has surprised is his target: the folks back home.
“I have a message for all the experts back in Washington: You don’t know Japan of today,” the former White House chief of staff for former US president Barack Obama said in January, citing advice he was given before taking his post about the need to tread slowly and softly. “Their predictions of what the future of Japan would be were myths. Japan has busted every one of those myths.”
I usually avoid the Tokyo embassy scene, but reached out to Emanuel because his take resonated. One of my great frustrations is with how Japan is perceived outside it, leading to what I have called a “comprehension gap” that reduces the country to stereotypes — or simply ignores it. Here was perhaps the first senior political figure I could recall making the same argument as mine, which is why I sought his perspective for my column to declare an end to Japan’s era of “lost decades.”
Illustration: Mountain People
“It is a different Japan,” he agreed when we spoke last week. “The United States has to update the way it thinks about Japan.”
Previous ambassadors, assuming they had much of a profile at all, often spent more time telling their host nation what to do — an approach that could grate, given Japan’s history as a US-occupied nation and Tokyo’s desire to be treated as an equal partner.
Former US ambassador to Japan Caroline Kennedy, the only recent envoy with a profile on par with Emanuel’s, ruffled feathers across the country when she criticized the Taiji dolphin hunt. Her office also issued a rare criticism of then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine in 2013, just weeks after she took over.
By contrast, Emanuel is effusive in his praise — indeed, at times he seems to go above and beyond and stray into active boosting of the government, which might be more controversial if there were a more realistic prospect that Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party might lose power. (That still seems fanciful.)
I met the former Chicago mayor at the ambassador’s residence in Tokyo’s Akasaka district, beside the previously sleepy Toranomon quarter that has been transformed by a stunning redevelopment over the past decade. The historic low-rise residence, where Emperor Hirohito met with US general Douglas MacArthur in 1945, is now surrounded by glass skyscrapers.
It was late on a Friday afternoon, and Emanuel seemed to be feeling the effects of the week, having flown back to Washington for Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s recent state visit. Nonetheless, he lights up while discussing achievements in boosting national and regional security — at least, as seen from Washington’s perspective — put in place by Kishida.
“The guy implemented the most radical changes — in two years, not 20, without a single protest,” he said.
Emanuel lists the changes under the Kishida administration, including a relaxation of defense export rules, plans to raise national security spending to 2 percent of GDP and add counterstrike capabilities, and the smoothing of ties with South Korea. Despite his long time in power, Abe faced greater difficulty enacting much smaller changes.
Rahm contrasts the silence on Tokyo’s streets with protests in many democracies over varying domestic and international policies, from France to South Korea to the uproar in US universities.
“As a former chief of staff, I’m kind of impressed,” he said.
Kishida has benefited from the dramatic shift that has moved the US and China to strategic adversaries. When it comes to the subject of Beijing, we see the Emanuel that Japan might have expected when his appointment was first floated in the media — combative, hard-edged and distinctly undiplomatic.
He seems to enjoy needling China, and sometimes appears freer to speak about Beijing than his host country — such as his blasting of Chinese “hypocrisy” over the discharge of treated water from the damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. If reports last year that he was told by aides to US President Joe Biden to dial it back were true, the request was ineffective: Just this week, he wrote on X about a “Chinese pattern of plunder” surrounding allegations of doping in Olympic swimming and spying on European companies.
Emanuel also likes to hold Japan as a mirror to his own country to show the US where it has gone wrong, frequently raising the example of spotting young children walking home from school, alone or in groups, without fear of violence.
If there is one area he has strayed into controversy, it is his support for LGBTQ rights: Nationalists online decry what they see as his interference in Japan’s sovereignty with his calls for Japan to legalize same-sex marriage. Ironically, he has also taken flak from the other side too, with his backing of last year’s toothless legislation aimed at preventing LGBTQ discrimination.
Emanuel’s future in the country would depend on what is being called “moshi Tora” in Japan, meaning “if Trump” — the prospect of former US president Donald Trump triumphing in November’s election. Tokyo was caught badly off-guard by Trump’s surprise victory in 2016, necessitating an ingratiating emergency trip to the US by Abe to establish ties.
This week showed that Tokyo is taking no chances this time, with former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso dispatched to meet Trump in New York. Politically appointed ambassadors typically step down after a change in the White House — and Emanuel’s typically blunt work as a political commentator during the 2020 elections means any exception for him would seem unlikely.
For now, Emanuel’s the global cheerleader the Japanese badly need. He has a good story to tell — and he tells it better than most of Japan’s leaders. He is right about one thing: Regardless of who is in the White House next year, the US must update the way it sees its most vital Asian ally.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS