With the impacts of extreme climate change, Dubai, the United Arab Emirates’ desert-ensconced host for the 27th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP27), was inundated in one day with a deluge of rainfall that exceeded what it normally receives in an entire year.
Taiwan also experiences droughts every two to three years. Moreover, the so-called “hundred-year floods or droughts” of the past have become regular occurrences. Add on an active seismic zone and Taiwan’s national development must soberly face climate issues.
However, when the media widely reports on the water levels of Shihmen Reservoir (石門水庫) in Taoyuan, we see Taoyuan Mayor Simon Chang (張善政) and other city and county heads criticizing the nation’s energy policies, using water shortages and earthquakes as excuses to advocate the use of aging and risky nuclear power plants.
Science has proven that water shortages and energy policies are unrelated.
The decommissioning of unit 1 of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) started in 2018. Prior to that, the nation had droughts in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2010, 2014 and 2017. Even as water supply was an issue, the nation’s nuclear power plants continued to operate as usual.
Hydroelectric power plants rely on water supply to function and generates power depending on daily water levels. In comparison, nuclear power plants often experience load shedding when the cooling water overheats.
This shows that nuclear power could also take a hit from climate extremes, and earthquakes have of course also led to grave nuclear disasters.
Natural disasters impact energy generation, transportation and delivery infrastructure, leading to power outages. That and the protracted use of aging nuclear power plants are two separate issues. Just because some elected officials favor keeping nuclear power does not give them license to conflate separate issues and mislead the public.
The criticism of renewable energy sources is also delaying the transition to net zero emissions — the conclusion of the COP27 was centered on tripling the development of renewable energy, yet some attendees supported the continued use of high-risk nuclear power, sparing no efforts to tarnish the accomplishments and records of renewable energy sources.
There was once a constant chorus about how “water shortages are caused by solar power panels impacting rainfall,” but once ample precipitation records proved that was false, the misleading narratives shifted to how “solar power installations at fish farms are creating breeding grounds for dengue-fever bearing mosquitoes,” and so on.
These fallacies do nothing to help Taiwan move toward net zero emissions.
Water shortages and earthquakes should be cause for protecting mountainous areas from development.
Taoyuan in 2004 had to suspend water supply for two weeks and cough up NT$15 billion (US$461 million) to clean up the Shihmen Reservoir after Typhoon Aere.
However, Chang last week decided to steam ahead with the development of Lalashan (拉拉山) by shortening the timeline for ecological impact assessments.
Chang has relaxed the strict regulations on development of mountainous slopes, yet when it comes to the crippling effects of earthquakes on nuclear power plants, he has dragged out the scheduled phasing out of aging nuclear power plants when they should not be delayed.
Mayors and county commissioners who support the continued use of aging nuclear power plants should accept spent nuclear fuel rods with open arms.
Officials such as Chang, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) and Yunlin County Commissioner Chang Li-shan (張麗善) oppose phasing out nuclear power plants, yet the issue of what to do with spent fuel rods and waste remains.
When the Taitung County Council was to vote on sending low-level nuclear waste from contentious storage facilities on Orchid Island (蘭嶼) to Taitung to be processed, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration opposed the plan.
With KMT mayors and county commissioners supporting the continued use of aging nuclear power plants, it seems odd that they did not jump at the chance to welcome a facility for handling spent nuclear fuel so as to alleviate doubts over the storage of nuclear waste.
Chen Bing-heng is chairman of the Matsu Fish Conservation Union.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS