The economy embodies society’s flesh and culture, its heart and soul. Economics and culture in a normal society need proper attention and simultaneous development.
Body and mind need to be healthy. If only the economy is developed, then the body grows obese. If only culture is developed, then the country resembles a skeleton.
Economies provide material conditions, and culture provides conditions of the spirit. Politics could be viewed as a critical bridge linking the two. Managing human relations could be seen as the conditions for constructing a society of laws.
Taiwan emphasizes its economy, but neglects its culture. Rulers over this land have done so since their ancestors first crossed over the “black ditch” — the Taiwan Strait.
Indigenous communities had yet to develop their own writing culture, but their cultures were ones that involved responding to nature, and enacting rites and ceremonies.
Taiwan was colonized by several foreign powers, absorbing everything thrown at it. Yet, because its national core was not fully developed, its cultural, economic and political spheres were not built up in a balanced fashion. The direction it has taken — economic emphasis and cultural neglect — has not changed one bit.
Because of economic emphasis and cultural neglect, the nation tends toward technological prowess under economic growth and production chains that tie the whole world together, with people innovating their way to the economic fruits of their labor.
Taiwan’s cultural progression pales in comparison. Worshiping in temples echoes business results, inundating people with a social mentality from a former era that dreads natural disasters. With broadcast media fanning the flames, the cognizance of the problems recognized by Taiwan’s New Culture Movement from a century ago are clearer.
The factories that grow the fruits of the nation’s economic labor not only pair well with the intoxication of government officials who fawn over industry, they also have the unfortunate effect of creating an age resembling a theocracy.
Economic ideals are a response to scientific roles, but the sentimentality of culture remains mired in swamps of ancient folk customs. When the scene is examined from a cultural perspective, is a nation really something wanted by Taiwanese?
Democratization is an ingrained part of Taiwan’s history, a history of a people governing themselves. Yet, as lords of their own land, Taiwanese have a long way to go to gain and have mastery over their rights and responsibilities.
Burdened by a long martial law period, Taiwanese grew complacent in being ruled through brutality, developing an incomplete personality that runs away from freedom. This is not far from what psychologist and philosopher Erich Fromm said of people being cowed.
In post-democratization Taiwan there is still the problem of it becoming an incomplete country. Stuck between the remnants of an iteration of China and a newborn Taiwan, Taiwanese still anxiously oscillate between identification and belonging. This problem was brought about by the “Republic of China on Taiwan.”
The “status quo” is an internal Taiwanese contradiction. Taiwan’s entanglement with China is also a problem of international governance.
To mold a modern public consensus, Taiwan needs to form a social movement with culture at its core.
Taiwan must build up a modern and progressive cultural revitalization movement to create a normalized, healthy sense of nationhood.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS