The senior-high school section of Chung Cheng Armed Forces Preparatory School has registered 580 cadets out of 900 applicants, a three-year high.
The numbers show that willingness to serve in the military has not been affected by pension reform. They also shatter the lie that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) saber-rattling affects willingness to serve among Taiwanese.
A former director of National Defense University’s Fu Hsing Kang College who became an instructor following several years of military service applied for retirement at age 47 and began receiving his lifetime pension.
In addition to a monthly stipend of about NT$60,000, he continues to work, having entered the tourism industry. Many of his coworkers are amazed at his double income.
His example shows that most service members have a guaranteed livelihood after retiring, which is nothing like what some rumor-happy people have said about severe effects on one’s livelihood leading to a poor quality of life.
Good treatment of and benefits for veterans seem to have been factors for many applicants taking the preparatory school’s placement exams.
As for the CCP’s threats to use military force against Taiwan, some people in social discourse are trying to convince others that bravery and willingness to serve would take a hit among most people.
After all, nobody who serves in any country’s military is particularly keen about the prospect of war, and the threat to life and limb.
However, if the CCP launches a war, all Taiwanese would need to face this trial. It would be unavoidable for everyone.
If everyone has the resolve to face a national crisis together, and show determination to resist and fight back, it would be a blow to the CCP’s ambitions for Taiwan.
That so many fresh graduates of junior-high schools are willing to apply to the preparatory school — the nation’s base institution for the cultivation of officers and the core of the military — clearly shows that the younger generation is not only willing to fight back against aggressors, but is also willing to bear the burden of protecting home and country.
Chen Chi-nung is a former specialist training instructor at Cheng Kung Lin Base.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022