TPP letting voters down
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), have turned their backs on the party’s younger supporters, with its legislators acting as lackeys for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Last year, TPP legislator-at-large Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) quit the New Power Party, which he founded, to join the TPP. The switch contradicted Huang’s original stand against the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and confused New Power Party and TPP supporters.
Luckily for them, the TPP secured eight seats in the legislature and plays a key role in decisionmaking, as neither the KMT nor the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won an outright majority.
However, what did these key players do?
When deciding on a legislative speaker, none of the TPP’s lawmakers voted for any of the KMT or DPP nominees, while at the same time saying they would assess candidates’ support for transparency and oversight reforms.
Consequently, the KMT’s nominee, Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), was elected speaker.
TPP legislators abstained from a vote on pension reform on the reconsideration of a KMT proposal, resulting in it proceeding to a review.
However, rolling back pension reform would increase the burden on younger generations, as under the bill retired public officials, teachers and military personnel would be eligible for a monthly pension stipend of NT$70,000.
As for the legislative reforms, Huang abstained from a vote when the KMT motioned to adjourn a meeting in which the DPP’s proposed reforms to the legislature were supposed to be reviewed.
In these cases, the TPP should have held the key to the passage or rejection of policies.
However, the party has done nothing but abstain from voting.
Pension reform concerns young Taiwanese, but the TPP, as a so-called representative of younger voters, has not dared speak out on it.
Ko has said that pension reform is not an issue with a yes or no answer, sidetracking the party’s young supporters by hiding the truth that he does not intend to stick up for their rights.
Young Taiwanese have been duped by Ko and Huang.
The two have been talking nonsense to solicit more support from younger voters. TPP legislators skipped voting, giving essential approval to every policy the KMT put forth.
The truth is that the “white” camp is not a neutral electoral force. Younger voters have probably woken up by now and feel regret.
Ko has said that the pan-blue and pan-green camps are rotten, but he himself has often gone back on his word and has spoken well of them just to win more votes.
Now, his legislators have become bootlickers for the blue camp and are forming an alliance with KMT Legislator and caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁).
Lin Han
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS