TPP letting voters down
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman, Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), have turned their backs on the party’s younger supporters, with its legislators acting as lackeys for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Last year, TPP legislator-at-large Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) quit the New Power Party, which he founded, to join the TPP. The switch contradicted Huang’s original stand against the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and confused New Power Party and TPP supporters.
Luckily for them, the TPP secured eight seats in the legislature and plays a key role in decisionmaking, as neither the KMT nor the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won an outright majority.
However, what did these key players do?
When deciding on a legislative speaker, none of the TPP’s lawmakers voted for any of the KMT or DPP nominees, while at the same time saying they would assess candidates’ support for transparency and oversight reforms.
Consequently, the KMT’s nominee, Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), was elected speaker.
TPP legislators abstained from a vote on pension reform on the reconsideration of a KMT proposal, resulting in it proceeding to a review.
However, rolling back pension reform would increase the burden on younger generations, as under the bill retired public officials, teachers and military personnel would be eligible for a monthly pension stipend of NT$70,000.
As for the legislative reforms, Huang abstained from a vote when the KMT motioned to adjourn a meeting in which the DPP’s proposed reforms to the legislature were supposed to be reviewed.
In these cases, the TPP should have held the key to the passage or rejection of policies.
However, the party has done nothing but abstain from voting.
Pension reform concerns young Taiwanese, but the TPP, as a so-called representative of younger voters, has not dared speak out on it.
Ko has said that pension reform is not an issue with a yes or no answer, sidetracking the party’s young supporters by hiding the truth that he does not intend to stick up for their rights.
Young Taiwanese have been duped by Ko and Huang.
The two have been talking nonsense to solicit more support from younger voters. TPP legislators skipped voting, giving essential approval to every policy the KMT put forth.
The truth is that the “white” camp is not a neutral electoral force. Younger voters have probably woken up by now and feel regret.
Ko has said that the pan-blue and pan-green camps are rotten, but he himself has often gone back on his word and has spoken well of them just to win more votes.
Now, his legislators have become bootlickers for the blue camp and are forming an alliance with KMT Legislator and caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁).
Lin Han
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS