Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT.
However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election.
Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s pro-local faction, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) turned to China to echo Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Sinicization” of Taiwan. Some KMT legislators such as Fu Kun-chi
(?) have even turned localization into a family business. Instead of following Lee’s political line, Fu puts profit before everything else, and bows down to China’s terms and conditions in exchange for its favors.
Also, some local KMT politicians have expanded and are interfering in foreign affairs, while more radical KMT politicians in Taipei and New Taipei City often act like political commentators on talk shows, trying to uncover scandals, and trying to attract KMT supporters with vulgar language.
In the past, the KMT relied on its Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) military chapter, the Yan (顏) family in Taichung, the Chang (張) family in Yunlin and Fu Kun-chi’s family in Hualien to secure its turf in northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan respectively. It recently reorganized the Huang Fu-hsing military chapter to help solve the party leadership’s financial difficulties.
Since the three political families have money and votes, they have suddenly become major pillars of the party’s survival. Under such circumstances, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) cannot control the three families, and this is likely to limit the party’s development.
On the other side of the political aisle, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) incoming Cabinet highlights the party’s de-academicization and de-partisanship, as many of the appointed Cabinet members are independent professionals with practical experience, which also shows the party’s ambition to expand its appeal. The DPP has not forgotten that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was recruited as an independent professional.
Academics often fill key government posts in democratic countries because of their expertise. However, one downside is they could also be more idealistic and less pragmatic.
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) has named several entrepreneurs as part of his Cabinet. They have practical backgrounds, understand Taiwan’s business situation and international trends and their achievements in business are obvious to all — not to mention they are more “down to earth.”
Such a Cabinet requires an open mindset to attract a wide range of talents that would be willing to join. After the KMT’s long rule over the half-century, some Taiwanese are still skeptical about joining the DPP’s team out of fear of KMT retaliation.
However, outstanding business talents in the private sector are now willing to join the DPP team, which is a major psychological breakthrough.
While the KMT is entangled in Sinicization, self-limiting its appeal, the DPP is going for eclecticism, pragmatism and the inclusion of “non-partisans,” as it continues to expand and to Taiwanize.
The Taiwanization of Chiang and Lee has been abandoned by the KMT and embraced by the DPP.
James Wang is a senior journalist.
ranslated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS