Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT.
However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election.
Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s pro-local faction, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) turned to China to echo Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Sinicization” of Taiwan. Some KMT legislators such as Fu Kun-chi
(?) have even turned localization into a family business. Instead of following Lee’s political line, Fu puts profit before everything else, and bows down to China’s terms and conditions in exchange for its favors.
Also, some local KMT politicians have expanded and are interfering in foreign affairs, while more radical KMT politicians in Taipei and New Taipei City often act like political commentators on talk shows, trying to uncover scandals, and trying to attract KMT supporters with vulgar language.
In the past, the KMT relied on its Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) military chapter, the Yan (顏) family in Taichung, the Chang (張) family in Yunlin and Fu Kun-chi’s family in Hualien to secure its turf in northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan respectively. It recently reorganized the Huang Fu-hsing military chapter to help solve the party leadership’s financial difficulties.
Since the three political families have money and votes, they have suddenly become major pillars of the party’s survival. Under such circumstances, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) cannot control the three families, and this is likely to limit the party’s development.
On the other side of the political aisle, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) incoming Cabinet highlights the party’s de-academicization and de-partisanship, as many of the appointed Cabinet members are independent professionals with practical experience, which also shows the party’s ambition to expand its appeal. The DPP has not forgotten that President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was recruited as an independent professional.
Academics often fill key government posts in democratic countries because of their expertise. However, one downside is they could also be more idealistic and less pragmatic.
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) has named several entrepreneurs as part of his Cabinet. They have practical backgrounds, understand Taiwan’s business situation and international trends and their achievements in business are obvious to all — not to mention they are more “down to earth.”
Such a Cabinet requires an open mindset to attract a wide range of talents that would be willing to join. After the KMT’s long rule over the half-century, some Taiwanese are still skeptical about joining the DPP’s team out of fear of KMT retaliation.
However, outstanding business talents in the private sector are now willing to join the DPP team, which is a major psychological breakthrough.
While the KMT is entangled in Sinicization, self-limiting its appeal, the DPP is going for eclecticism, pragmatism and the inclusion of “non-partisans,” as it continues to expand and to Taiwanize.
The Taiwanization of Chiang and Lee has been abandoned by the KMT and embraced by the DPP.
James Wang is a senior journalist.
ranslated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS