President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Monday promised to accelerate the development of geothermal and hydrogen energy sources as part of a push toward meeting net zero emissions aims.
Lai said his administration would aim to maximize the use of green energy in Taiwan, implement carbon capture and storage technologies, build smart energy systems, promote green manufacturing and expand the circular economy, among other policies.
Government agencies were studying the feasibility of maintaining closed nuclear reactors so they could be restarted in case of an emergency, he told a forum last year. The comment led to speculation that Lai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) might abandon plans for a “nuclear-free homeland.”
However, then-DPP spokesman Chang Chih-hao (張志豪) the following day dismissed the speculation, saying the party’s plans had not changed. Then, on Nov. 3, Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) reiterated the stance, saying that it was in alignment with public consensus.
Chen responded to opposition lawmakers’ claims that nuclear power is green energy by saying that Taiwan’s treatment of nuclear waste has not reached international standards — necessary for it to be eligible for “green energy financing and investment.”
The opposition legislators might have been referring to Europe’s recognition of nuclear power as a green energy source. The EU in 2022 voted to include nuclear energy, under certain circumstances, in its plans for achieving climate neutrality by 2050.
Chen also argued that Taiwan’s nuclear plants have been fraught with problems for decades due to safety concerns, a lack of consensus on waste storage and public protests.
Chen might be right about this, but progress on geothermal, wind power and other renewable energy sources here has also been slow, due mostly to public protests and a lack of investment.
As contributing reporter Michael Turton wrote in “Is Taiwan’s idea of nuclear free homeland sustainable?” on Feb. 26, the situation “has left Taiwan with few power options but to ramp up fossil fuel imports, particularly liquid natural gas” — a situation that makes Taiwan “terribly vulnerable to a fossil fuel blockade” in the event of war.
Then there is the issue of industry needs. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) wants to build two new IC packaging plants in Chiayi County, and the country’s tech sector is expanding.
The power supply in Taiwan is already insufficient to meet the demand, and there will be even greater demand when new fabs go online.
Lai’s administration should heavily subsidize the development of geothermal, wind and marine energy power plants, as well as more efficient battery technologies.
Having a robust energy storage system would ensure continuous supply, while plants along the country’s coastline would give the grid redundancy, making it resilient to failure, damage from earthquakes and destruction during wartime.
As Taiwan’s tech sector grows, and as the deadlines for its emissions goals come closer, the country would have greater electricity needs.
If those needs are to be met with green energy, Lai’s administration will need to aggressively support the development of geothermal and other renewable solutions.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS