President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Monday promised to accelerate the development of geothermal and hydrogen energy sources as part of a push toward meeting net zero emissions aims.
Lai said his administration would aim to maximize the use of green energy in Taiwan, implement carbon capture and storage technologies, build smart energy systems, promote green manufacturing and expand the circular economy, among other policies.
Government agencies were studying the feasibility of maintaining closed nuclear reactors so they could be restarted in case of an emergency, he told a forum last year. The comment led to speculation that Lai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) might abandon plans for a “nuclear-free homeland.”
However, then-DPP spokesman Chang Chih-hao (張志豪) the following day dismissed the speculation, saying the party’s plans had not changed. Then, on Nov. 3, Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) reiterated the stance, saying that it was in alignment with public consensus.
Chen responded to opposition lawmakers’ claims that nuclear power is green energy by saying that Taiwan’s treatment of nuclear waste has not reached international standards — necessary for it to be eligible for “green energy financing and investment.”
The opposition legislators might have been referring to Europe’s recognition of nuclear power as a green energy source. The EU in 2022 voted to include nuclear energy, under certain circumstances, in its plans for achieving climate neutrality by 2050.
Chen also argued that Taiwan’s nuclear plants have been fraught with problems for decades due to safety concerns, a lack of consensus on waste storage and public protests.
Chen might be right about this, but progress on geothermal, wind power and other renewable energy sources here has also been slow, due mostly to public protests and a lack of investment.
As contributing reporter Michael Turton wrote in “Is Taiwan’s idea of nuclear free homeland sustainable?” on Feb. 26, the situation “has left Taiwan with few power options but to ramp up fossil fuel imports, particularly liquid natural gas” — a situation that makes Taiwan “terribly vulnerable to a fossil fuel blockade” in the event of war.
Then there is the issue of industry needs. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) wants to build two new IC packaging plants in Chiayi County, and the country’s tech sector is expanding.
The power supply in Taiwan is already insufficient to meet the demand, and there will be even greater demand when new fabs go online.
Lai’s administration should heavily subsidize the development of geothermal, wind and marine energy power plants, as well as more efficient battery technologies.
Having a robust energy storage system would ensure continuous supply, while plants along the country’s coastline would give the grid redundancy, making it resilient to failure, damage from earthquakes and destruction during wartime.
As Taiwan’s tech sector grows, and as the deadlines for its emissions goals come closer, the country would have greater electricity needs.
If those needs are to be met with green energy, Lai’s administration will need to aggressively support the development of geothermal and other renewable solutions.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS