Fentanyl ploy will backfire
In a recent report, the US Congress pointed out that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been subsidizing the production of fentanyl and other synthetic drugs through measures such as tax incentives. The CCP government’s practice contributes to the international trade in fentanyl and other synthetic drugs, it said.
Although the CCP’s security agencies reached an agreement with the US to jointly combat the trade of the drug, they notified the targets of the investigation in advance so they could avoid repercussions. As a result, the smuggling and sales of fentanyl have become rampant.
The report said that despite the drug being banned in China, the CCP has blocked information about it and failed to strictly scrutinize exports of it.
Fentanyl functions as a synthetic opiate painkiller and is commonly used to deal with severe pain. Compared with heroin, fentanyl is more likely to be fatal, because it is 50 times more potent.
The flood of the drug into the US is having serious effects.
Ninety-seven percent of fentanyl production is in China, which is why Washington asked Beijing to help stop the continuous production.
However, China only cooperates with the US on the surface, while supporting manufacturers and factories to produce large quantities of the drug behind the scenes.
China seems to believe that exports of fentanyl can make the people of the US and other countries addicted to it. Then it would be able to take control of the world in the long run.
However, China’s approach is unwise.
Although it has blocked Chinese in its territory from learning about fentanyl, it fails to consider that this approach would harm others without benefiting itself.
With the development of the Internet, people can learn about the drug by breaching the Great Firewall of China.
Moreover, overseas Chinese are in contact with people at home at all times.
Once the drug starts to spread in China, its own people would be in danger as well.
Such an approach that is harmful to others and to itself is undesirable indeed.
Lin Hui
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS