Fentanyl ploy will backfire
In a recent report, the US Congress pointed out that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been subsidizing the production of fentanyl and other synthetic drugs through measures such as tax incentives. The CCP government’s practice contributes to the international trade in fentanyl and other synthetic drugs, it said.
Although the CCP’s security agencies reached an agreement with the US to jointly combat the trade of the drug, they notified the targets of the investigation in advance so they could avoid repercussions. As a result, the smuggling and sales of fentanyl have become rampant.
The report said that despite the drug being banned in China, the CCP has blocked information about it and failed to strictly scrutinize exports of it.
Fentanyl functions as a synthetic opiate painkiller and is commonly used to deal with severe pain. Compared with heroin, fentanyl is more likely to be fatal, because it is 50 times more potent.
The flood of the drug into the US is having serious effects.
Ninety-seven percent of fentanyl production is in China, which is why Washington asked Beijing to help stop the continuous production.
However, China only cooperates with the US on the surface, while supporting manufacturers and factories to produce large quantities of the drug behind the scenes.
China seems to believe that exports of fentanyl can make the people of the US and other countries addicted to it. Then it would be able to take control of the world in the long run.
However, China’s approach is unwise.
Although it has blocked Chinese in its territory from learning about fentanyl, it fails to consider that this approach would harm others without benefiting itself.
With the development of the Internet, people can learn about the drug by breaching the Great Firewall of China.
Moreover, overseas Chinese are in contact with people at home at all times.
Once the drug starts to spread in China, its own people would be in danger as well.
Such an approach that is harmful to others and to itself is undesirable indeed.
Lin Hui
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS