In today’s era of breakneck-paced digital development, social media use has become a double-edged sword. It provides an unprecedented degree of connection, but with that comes unprecedented privacy and security risks.
TikTok, a social media platform bewitching young people around the globe, has once more become an international focal point. This is not only a result of social phenomena being pushed and promoted through the platform, but also the hidden potential for data security issues, directly involving the privacy of millions of people.
A recent edition of Fortune magazine published a bombshell report, quoting several former TikTok employees, using nicknames to maintain anonymity. They said that even if TikTok were to openly say that its data from the US were stored entirely in US data centers on US soil, asserting that there was enough distance between the data and TikTok’s China-based founding company, ByteDance, such a statement would be far removed from reality.
The former employees interviewed for the article said that about every 14 days, a massive amount of US user data are transmitted to Beijing. The data include not only users’ real names, e-mails and IP addresses, but also their geolocation data and population statistics for each user’s location.
It is difficult to downplay the risks of such data harvesting.
Although these data are one small part of the overall data TikTok collects, they could be used to carry out precision-targeted attacks on specific people, such as through phishing attempts and other illegal activities, Johns Hopkins University data security specialists said.
Additionally, the data harvesting could be used to conduct mass surveillance and political manipulation.
This is a massive concern for societies that promote democracy and personal freedom.
More concretely, the TikTok issue is an especially weighty issue in Taiwan, a democratic and free society.
The nation has extremely high requirements to fulfill when it comes to data security and personal privacy protection.
However, given the broad use of TikTok among young Taiwanese, the sort of data transfers the company engages in is undoubtedly a challenge for national security. Not only is there a risk to personal data security, but the entire country’s information security environment.
The government has taken steps to face this challenge, with Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) announcing that he would push for legislation that limits TikTok’s activities. This is an indication of the government’s resolve to protect data security.
However, Taiwanese should not rely solely on government efforts. All of society, from individuals to academic institutions to private enterprises and beyond, must take steps together to protect data.
Taiwanese must raise their own awareness on protecting personal data to avoid leaking information.
With globalization and the daily creep toward digitalization, data security and protection of personal privacy have become worldwide issues.
The fracas surrounding TikTok is a reminder that the whole world is needed to face the challenge.
When it comes to Taiwan, this is not only an issue of technology, but also a vital issue concerning the country’s future and the security of its people. Through the joint efforts of all of society, Taiwan can maintain vigilance in this digital war, safeguard the security of personal data and guarantee the right to privacy.
Fang Kai-hung is an assistant professor at Taipei University of Maritime Technology.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s