The victory of Vice President William Lai (賴清德) in January’s presidential election raised questions about the future of China’s unification strategy toward Taiwan.
A decade ago, the assumption in Bejing had been that deepening economic ties with Taiwan would bring about a political accommodation eventually leading to political integration. Not only has this not happened, but it hastened the opposite. Taiwanese are more concerned with safeguarding their political independence than they have ever been.
China’s preferred party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has not won a presidential election since 2012. Clearly, Beijing’s strategy is not working.
Polling conducted by the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica in its “American Portrait” survey last year showed that just 9.3 percent of respondents believed China was a “credible” country and 82.7 percent believed the threat from China had increased in recent years.
More recent polling conducted by the Mainland Affairs Council showed that more than 60 percent supported maintaining the “status quo” indefinitely.
This is bad news for Beijing’s “peaceful unification” strategy, which relies on Taiwanese willingness to embrace unification. With the peaceful plan stalling, an impatient Beijing has three options:
First, it can ramp up coercion — which it is doing. However, this is a suboptimal tactic, as it hardens Taiwanese resolve. Second is an all-out invasion, which is far too risky, as the Chinese People’s Liberation Army cannot be sure of victory. Third, revise and rejig the peaceful unification strategy.
In the wake of Lai’s election, two components of this rejigging have emerged. The first is to use pro-China politicians in Taiwan to undermine the elected government. This is in line with the emphasis on “uniting patriotic forces,” which came out of the Taiwan Work Affairs Conference in February. This has taken form in former president Ma Ying Jeou’s (馬英九) visit to China earlier this month and KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) leading a delegation to Beijing this week to name just two examples.
The second is Beijing’s renewed focus on young Taiwanese. An indication of this priority was evident when Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), during his meeting with Ma, said that young Taiwanese were welcome to “pursue, build and realize their dreams” in China.
“I hope young people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait will learn from each other,” he added.
Beijing is ramping up its propaganda efforts and economic offerings to young Taiwanese. For example, last year Beijing launched its Fujian Proposal — an initiative that aims to foster China-Taiwan ties through a “demonstration zone for integrated development” in Fujian Province. The proposal is in part directed at young Taiwanese by offering lower thresholds to get into good universities in the province and providing high-paying job opportunities.
“Despite the developmental gap between the two societies, Beijing believes its preferential policies towards newcomers from Taiwan, particularly the youth, are appealing and productive,” Lin Gang (林岡), a professor at the Center for Fujian-Taiwan Area Studies, wrote recently.
Chinese academics writing in a Xiamen University journal focused on Taiwan affairs recently said that the rising popularity of Chinese apps such as Xiaohongshu, or “Little Red Book,” among Taiwanese is good for China.
“As long as the mainland works properly, it can win the support of Taiwan’s Generation Z and create a rational and pragmatic young generation,” they wrote.
Although certainly not authoritative, these statements suggest that Beijing has faith in its ability to influence Taiwanese society over the long term and has not abandoned “peaceful unification.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS