The victory of Vice President William Lai (賴清德) in January’s presidential election raised questions about the future of China’s unification strategy toward Taiwan.
A decade ago, the assumption in Bejing had been that deepening economic ties with Taiwan would bring about a political accommodation eventually leading to political integration. Not only has this not happened, but it hastened the opposite. Taiwanese are more concerned with safeguarding their political independence than they have ever been.
China’s preferred party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has not won a presidential election since 2012. Clearly, Beijing’s strategy is not working.
Polling conducted by the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica in its “American Portrait” survey last year showed that just 9.3 percent of respondents believed China was a “credible” country and 82.7 percent believed the threat from China had increased in recent years.
More recent polling conducted by the Mainland Affairs Council showed that more than 60 percent supported maintaining the “status quo” indefinitely.
This is bad news for Beijing’s “peaceful unification” strategy, which relies on Taiwanese willingness to embrace unification. With the peaceful plan stalling, an impatient Beijing has three options:
First, it can ramp up coercion — which it is doing. However, this is a suboptimal tactic, as it hardens Taiwanese resolve. Second is an all-out invasion, which is far too risky, as the Chinese People’s Liberation Army cannot be sure of victory. Third, revise and rejig the peaceful unification strategy.
In the wake of Lai’s election, two components of this rejigging have emerged. The first is to use pro-China politicians in Taiwan to undermine the elected government. This is in line with the emphasis on “uniting patriotic forces,” which came out of the Taiwan Work Affairs Conference in February. This has taken form in former president Ma Ying Jeou’s (馬英九) visit to China earlier this month and KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) leading a delegation to Beijing this week to name just two examples.
The second is Beijing’s renewed focus on young Taiwanese. An indication of this priority was evident when Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), during his meeting with Ma, said that young Taiwanese were welcome to “pursue, build and realize their dreams” in China.
“I hope young people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait will learn from each other,” he added.
Beijing is ramping up its propaganda efforts and economic offerings to young Taiwanese. For example, last year Beijing launched its Fujian Proposal — an initiative that aims to foster China-Taiwan ties through a “demonstration zone for integrated development” in Fujian Province. The proposal is in part directed at young Taiwanese by offering lower thresholds to get into good universities in the province and providing high-paying job opportunities.
“Despite the developmental gap between the two societies, Beijing believes its preferential policies towards newcomers from Taiwan, particularly the youth, are appealing and productive,” Lin Gang (林岡), a professor at the Center for Fujian-Taiwan Area Studies, wrote recently.
Chinese academics writing in a Xiamen University journal focused on Taiwan affairs recently said that the rising popularity of Chinese apps such as Xiaohongshu, or “Little Red Book,” among Taiwanese is good for China.
“As long as the mainland works properly, it can win the support of Taiwan’s Generation Z and create a rational and pragmatic young generation,” they wrote.
Although certainly not authoritative, these statements suggest that Beijing has faith in its ability to influence Taiwanese society over the long term and has not abandoned “peaceful unification.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS