The tragic death of a judge who fell from a building on April 12 accentuated the issue of long-term overtime work endangering the mental and physical health of judicial officials.
Many have advocated for an increase in personnel or adjustments in case distribution to relieve the overworked judicial system, but the problem cannot be solved without evidence-based measures.
The problem with the overworked judicial system is not just that it is short-staffed, but also a systematic problem of how to allocate judicial resources appropriately.
Aside from Taiwan, many other countries are facing the same challenges.
Indicator 16.3 of the UN’s 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promotes “the rule of law at the national and international levels, and ensures equal access to justice for all,” encouraging the globe to conduct scientific empirical investigation and thorough understanding of the actual judicial needs of the public.
For this, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development collaborated with Pathfinders and published a policy paper last year titled “Improving the monitoring of SDG 16.3.3: Towards better access to justice,” to promote an international standard for access to justice.
The Legal Australia-Wide Survey: Legal need in Australia in 2012 states that the legal problems raised by 9 percent of interviewees accounted for 65 percent of the total, highlighting the centralization of access to justice.
In addition, about one-third of Australians would encounter at least one legal issue within two years, with common disputes tied to consumerism, neighborhoods or money.
Regarding vulnerable groups who need increased access to justice, the Australian government offered administrative resources and alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) to effectively ease the burden on the judicial system.
Additionally, the Canadian Legal Problems Survey conducted in 2021 revealed the same problem.
About 50 percent of Canadians were involved in legal disputes, most of which were domestic, consumer or neighborhood disputes.
Thus, the Canadian government successfully reduced the number of judicial cases by optimizing their ADR and providing legal services in communities.
Learning from international experiences, to cope with simple and common cases in high demand, increasing personnel in the administration would be more effective than adding personnel to the judicial system.
I hope president-elect William Lai (賴清德) will fulfill his commitment to establish a standing committee on judicial reform in charge of an empirical judicial inquiry, increase the number of administrative officials and loosen the overworked judicial system to achieve sustainable development goals for the country.
Hsiao Yi-ming is resource development manager of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
RSS