After months of delays, the US House of Representatives on Saturday and the US Senate on Tuesday finally approved a US$95 billion foreign aid package that includes funding for Taiwan. The bills were passed with bipartisan support, with House Speaker Mike Johnson saying that “we have to do the right thing. And history will judge us.”
The bills — containing US$60.8 billion for Kyiv, US$26 billion for Israel and humanitarian aid for civilians in conflict zones, and US$8 billion for Taiwan and Indo-Pacific allies of the US — was combined into a single piece of legislation, which US President Joe Biden said “comes at a moment of grave urgency.” He signed it into law immediately.
The supplemental defense funding had stalled in the Republican-led lower chamber for months due to objections to providing more funds to Ukraine from some far-right Republicans.
The legislative wrangling reflects a major political division in the US ahead of November’s presidential election, factors that are being closely observed by its allies and enemies to see whether the US would protect its traditional interests on the global stage or turn toward the “America first” isolationism of former US president Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner.
Despite the risk to his position as speaker, Johnson turned his back on his party’s populist faction and pushed the legislation through.
“I believe that [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping,
(習近平) and [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and Iran really are an axis of evil,” Johnson said.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Mike McCaul drew an analogy between the US’ posture toward Putin and Britain’s appeasement of Nazi Germany under then-British prime minister Neville Chamberlain and the stalwart resistance of his successor, Winston Churchill.
“As we deliberate on this vote, you have to ask yourself this question: Am I Chamberlain or Churchill?” McCaul said.
Passing the Ukraine aid bill might not make Johnson another Churchill, but it definitely makes him a braver figure than many critics previously expected.
The Indo-Pacific security supplemental bill aiming to counter China and enhance Taiwan’s military defense capability passed in the House with a vote of 385-34, while the Ukraine bill passed by 311-112 and the Israel bill passed 366-58.
In Taiwan, there is also a longstanding debate over whether to confront or appease China’s authoritarianism, which has resulted in provocative interference, including military intrusions and cognitive warfare in the run-up to January’s presidential election.
Fortunately, Taiwanese chose a new president, William Lai (賴清德), who has vowed to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy and sovereignty. Most Taiwanese oppose China’s ambition to take over Taiwan.
However, pro-China politicians, such as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) and KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?), have or are going to visit China to echo Xi’s “greater China” dream and pursue commercial benefits.
To ensure peace and stability in the Strait, Taiwan should follow in the footsteps of Churchill and align with democratic allies against authoritarianism. This not only relies on boosting military defense capability, but also great determination and resilience.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS