There was a time, not so long ago, when the depletion of Earth’s ozone layer seemed like an insurmountable challenge.
Decades of using harmful chemicals, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), threatened to cause irreparable damage to our planet. Without swift action, we faced the risk of climate destabilization, ecosystem collapse and the breakdown of our food system. Consequences that were once almost unthinkable became painfully real.
However, then the most remarkable thing happened: Humanity united to protect the ozone layer. Heeding the warnings of Nobel laureate scientists Paul Crutzen, Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland, whose research underscored the severity of the threat, we did not ignore or dismiss the scientific evidence, nor did we bury our heads in the sand and claim that the challenge was too daunting. Instead, the global community recognized the urgent need for collective action.
By harnessing scientific knowledge, entire industries have been transformed and equitable policies have been put in place to shield countries that did not contribute to the problem.
Thanks to the Montreal Protocol, ratified by 197 countries, nearly 99 percent of ozone-depleting substances have been phased out. This includes the reduction and replacement of CFCs, which has slowed climate change by at least a decade.
The successful global effort to protect the ozone layer should serve as a beacon of hope for all of us. It is one of humanity’s greatest environmental achievements, showing what we can achieve when we act together with commitment, respect and determination.
However, it can also serve as a warning. A study last year by Johan Rockstrom and 28 other leading climate scientists revealed a startling new reality, underscoring the need to adopt a collaborative approach to protecting the planet before it is too late.
The planetary boundaries model, introduced by Rockstrom and others in 2009, provides a useful framework for assessing the planet’s health. It identifies nine interconnected factors — including climate, freshwater availability, biodiversity and land use — that are crucial for the planet’s stability and habitability.
In their recent study, Rockstrom and his co-authors found that six of these nine boundaries have already been breached, putting Earth on a dangerous course that undermines the planet’s resilience and jeopardizes human well-being. Notably, the ozone layer is the only area showing signs of improvement.
Given that Earth functions as an interconnected system, we cannot solve one problem without addressing the others. Despite being aware of the critical role of planetary boundaries in preserving our Earth’s habitability, we have not acted decisively enough to halt our slide toward catastrophe.
For example, we know that more than a million species are on the brink of extinction, potentially triggering the collapse of entire ecosystems. We also know that nitrogen and phosphorous runoff leads to the proliferation of toxic algae blooms in oceans and freshwater systems, thereby breaching the biogeochemical flow boundary. Similarly, tolerating dangerous levels of chemical pollution and allowing our children to ingest microplastics compromise the life-support systems necessary for humanity’s survival.
To restore Earth’s stability, governments must recognize the need to respect the nine planetary boundaries. This requires a steadfast commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting biodiversity and water resources.
Moreover, our chances of success increase exponentially when we cooperate: If the international community can unite as it did when it agreed to repair the ozone layer, there is hope.
First, we must heed the advice of indigenous peoples and local communities and listen to what nature is telling us. Despite making up less than 5 percent of the global population, indigenous communities act as the planet’s wise custodians, protecting at least one-quarter of the world’s land and seas and 80 percent of its biodiversity.
To advance this approach, we have joined forces with Planetary Guardians, an independent collective of global leaders, scientists and environmental advocates championing the planetary boundaries model. Our goal is to promote its adoption as a framework for assessing and guiding collective climate action.
By bringing together leaders from various countries, industries, age groups, genders and cultures, Planetary Guardians aims to leverage our diverse backgrounds and experiences to find solutions to protect the planet. While our planet’s resources are finite, there is no limit to human ingenuity and our capacity for solving complex problems. The real question is what Earth we wish to leave to future generations.
To be sure, there are no simple answers or quick fixes. Our future hinges on the steps each of us is willing to take. However, in saving the ozone layer, we have already shown that taking swift, informed, collective action can facilitate the changes needed to sustain human life on Earth.
Robert Redford, co-founder of the Redford Center, is an actor, director and producer. Xiye Bastida, a climate justice activist from the Otomi-Toltec indigenous community in Central Mexico, is an organizer with Fridays For Future and co-founder of the Re-Earth Initiative.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself