There was a time, not so long ago, when the depletion of Earth’s ozone layer seemed like an insurmountable challenge.
Decades of using harmful chemicals, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), threatened to cause irreparable damage to our planet. Without swift action, we faced the risk of climate destabilization, ecosystem collapse and the breakdown of our food system. Consequences that were once almost unthinkable became painfully real.
However, then the most remarkable thing happened: Humanity united to protect the ozone layer. Heeding the warnings of Nobel laureate scientists Paul Crutzen, Mario Molina and Sherwood Rowland, whose research underscored the severity of the threat, we did not ignore or dismiss the scientific evidence, nor did we bury our heads in the sand and claim that the challenge was too daunting. Instead, the global community recognized the urgent need for collective action.
By harnessing scientific knowledge, entire industries have been transformed and equitable policies have been put in place to shield countries that did not contribute to the problem.
Thanks to the Montreal Protocol, ratified by 197 countries, nearly 99 percent of ozone-depleting substances have been phased out. This includes the reduction and replacement of CFCs, which has slowed climate change by at least a decade.
The successful global effort to protect the ozone layer should serve as a beacon of hope for all of us. It is one of humanity’s greatest environmental achievements, showing what we can achieve when we act together with commitment, respect and determination.
However, it can also serve as a warning. A study last year by Johan Rockstrom and 28 other leading climate scientists revealed a startling new reality, underscoring the need to adopt a collaborative approach to protecting the planet before it is too late.
The planetary boundaries model, introduced by Rockstrom and others in 2009, provides a useful framework for assessing the planet’s health. It identifies nine interconnected factors — including climate, freshwater availability, biodiversity and land use — that are crucial for the planet’s stability and habitability.
In their recent study, Rockstrom and his co-authors found that six of these nine boundaries have already been breached, putting Earth on a dangerous course that undermines the planet’s resilience and jeopardizes human well-being. Notably, the ozone layer is the only area showing signs of improvement.
Given that Earth functions as an interconnected system, we cannot solve one problem without addressing the others. Despite being aware of the critical role of planetary boundaries in preserving our Earth’s habitability, we have not acted decisively enough to halt our slide toward catastrophe.
For example, we know that more than a million species are on the brink of extinction, potentially triggering the collapse of entire ecosystems. We also know that nitrogen and phosphorous runoff leads to the proliferation of toxic algae blooms in oceans and freshwater systems, thereby breaching the biogeochemical flow boundary. Similarly, tolerating dangerous levels of chemical pollution and allowing our children to ingest microplastics compromise the life-support systems necessary for humanity’s survival.
To restore Earth’s stability, governments must recognize the need to respect the nine planetary boundaries. This requires a steadfast commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting biodiversity and water resources.
Moreover, our chances of success increase exponentially when we cooperate: If the international community can unite as it did when it agreed to repair the ozone layer, there is hope.
First, we must heed the advice of indigenous peoples and local communities and listen to what nature is telling us. Despite making up less than 5 percent of the global population, indigenous communities act as the planet’s wise custodians, protecting at least one-quarter of the world’s land and seas and 80 percent of its biodiversity.
To advance this approach, we have joined forces with Planetary Guardians, an independent collective of global leaders, scientists and environmental advocates championing the planetary boundaries model. Our goal is to promote its adoption as a framework for assessing and guiding collective climate action.
By bringing together leaders from various countries, industries, age groups, genders and cultures, Planetary Guardians aims to leverage our diverse backgrounds and experiences to find solutions to protect the planet. While our planet’s resources are finite, there is no limit to human ingenuity and our capacity for solving complex problems. The real question is what Earth we wish to leave to future generations.
To be sure, there are no simple answers or quick fixes. Our future hinges on the steps each of us is willing to take. However, in saving the ozone layer, we have already shown that taking swift, informed, collective action can facilitate the changes needed to sustain human life on Earth.
Robert Redford, co-founder of the Redford Center, is an actor, director and producer. Xiye Bastida, a climate justice activist from the Otomi-Toltec indigenous community in Central Mexico, is an organizer with Fridays For Future and co-founder of the Re-Earth Initiative.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic